The High Court declined to consider refund applications u/s 54 ...

Denial of GST refund due to improper application filing. Court cites relevant rules for manual applications. Petitioner's case remanded for fresh review.

Case Laws GST

June 19, 2024

The High Court declined to consider refund applications u/s 54 (3) of GST for FY 2017-2018, 2018-2019 & 2020-2021 due to non-filing of RFD-01 forms as petitioner was unregistered. Citing precedent from Bombay and Gujarat High Courts, assessing authority must consider Rule 97A allowing manual applications. Petitioner, though unregistered, eligible u/s 54 (1) for refund. Refusal based on lack of registration and failure to consider Rule 41 on credit transfer deemed incorrect. The impugned order was set aside, remanding the matter for fresh consideration within four weeks. Petition allowed for remand.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The High Court declined to consider refund applications u/s 54 ...

Denial of GST refund due to improper application filing. Court cites relevant rules for manual applications. Petitioner's case remanded for fresh review.

Case Laws GST

June 19, 2024

You may also like:

Refund of accumulated input tax credit - relevant date for the purpose of considering the limitation u/s 54 - The High Court addressed this issue by directing the...

Manual filing of applications for Advance Ruling and appeals before Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling

Application for refund filed manually - Since rule 97A contains a non-obstante clause, it is intended to override rules 89 to 97 of the CGST Rules forming part of...

Refund of CENVAT Credit - alleged lack of nexus - The procedure for claiming such refund, enshrined in notification no. 27/2012-Central Excise Act, 1944 (NT) dated 18th...

Refund claim of service tax paid on cancelled transactions - Post GST era - Rejection of refund under Rule 6(3) of Service Tax Rules read with Sec 142(5) of CGST Act -...

Rejection of the refund application - rejection on the ground of time limitation - Defective refund application - The High Court held that, even assuming that the...

Supplementary refund of unutilized input tax credit pertaining to Compensatory Cess - Section 164 of the GST Act empowers the Government to frame rules. Refund of...

Scope of deficiencies in the GST refund application - Documents / Evidences to be submitted with the refund application - the petitioner’s application for refund cannot...

The High Court considered a case regarding refund of Input Tax Credit. The petitioner's refund application was rejected due to lack of supporting documents. The...

Period of limitation for claiming refund under GST - Relevant Date - Discussion Forum

Refund of unutilized CENVAT credit - In so far the claim for refund of CENVAT credit for the period prior to 01.04.2012 is concerned, as Rule at the relevant point of...

Refund of GST - Export of goods - allegation of use of fake invoices to claim refund - Since the present is a case of an allegation of raising fake invoices and the...

Denial of interest on the refund claim sanctioned to the appellant - it is seen that in ordinary course of refund arising out of finalization of provisional assessment...

Refund of GST paid deposited by the Vendor on advance paid by the appellant since no supply was made - Return/refund of the entire advance amount - The High Court found...

Refund of CENVAT Credit - time limitation - Relevant Date - From the definition of ‘relevant date’, it can be seen that sub clause (a) of Clause (B) of definition of...

Quick Updates: