The High Court addressed a case where Budgetary support was ...

Bagheri Unit claimed budgetary support not Baga Unit. Order set aside for fresh decision. Petition remanded for personal hearing.

June 19, 2024

Case Laws GST HC

The High Court addressed a case where Budgetary support was claimed by Bagheri Unit, not Baga Unit. The court found that the petitioner's plea for full budgetary support for Bagheri Unit was not considered. Orders by the 4th respondent and Commissioner (Appeals) were set aside. The matter was remitted back to the 4th respondent for fresh decision after providing a personal hearing. The 4th respondent's failure to give a personal hearing and provide reasons for rejecting a portion of the claim led to setting aside of the Order-in-Original. The case was remanded back for reconsideration of the claim for budgetary support for the 3rd quarter. The petition was disposed of through remand.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The High Court addressed a case where Budgetary support was ...

Bagheri Unit claimed budgetary support not Baga Unit. Order set aside for fresh decision. Petition remanded for personal hearing.

June 19, 2024

Case Laws GST HC

You may also like:

Rejection of petitioner’s claim for benefit of budgetary support - If the provisions of the Scheme Notification are given the meaning as sought to be done by the...

Rejection of the petitioner’s claim for budgetary support - Violation of principles of natural justice - The court emphasized that the Budgetary Support Scheme mandated...

Area Based Exemption - Denial of budgetary support - It is material to note that it is not disputed that but for the controversy whether the petitioner was availing the...

Area Based Exemption - Benefit of budgetary scheme - The respondent authorities are therefore directed to examine the individual claims of the petitioners and if they...

The High Court allowed the appeals and set aside the impugned judgment of the Single Judge. The court held that to avail the Budgetary Support Scheme (BSS), the...

HC allowed the petitioner's refund claim, holding that the rejection of Rs. 2,195/- by the respondent was improper and contrary to the budgetary support scheme...

Scheme of budgetary support for cash component of CGST and IGST for eligible industrial units for residual period in States of North Eastern region and Himalayan states

Claim of rebate/refund - export of goods from DTA unit to SEZ units - initially applicant cleared excisable goods without payment of duty under UT-I Bond to the SEZ Unit...

HC adjudicated a tax refund dispute involving budgetary support claims under CGST Act, 2017. The court found the respondent's rejection of partial refund claims...

The preliminary assessment u/s 143(1) is limited to processing the return for arithmetical errors, incorrect expense claims, verifying audit reports, deductions, and...

Transfer of CENVAT Credit - closure of Delhi unit & merger with its Baddi unit - Rule 10 of CCR - prima-facie with respect to claim of the appellant or request for...

Eligible unit for budgetary support - doctrine of promissory estoppel and legitimate expectation - sunset clause prescribed under Excise Exemption Notification, giving...

Denial of CENVAT credit distributed by the Head Office (Input Service Distributor) to a unit during April to June 2012. The denial was based on the ground that the...

Disallowance of credit - With regard to the payment of service tax made by Unit No. II, since the said unit is centralized registered, Unit No. II is under obligation to...

Imported material diverted to unit other than permitted unit, resulting in contravention of import-export policy provisions. Goods held liable for confiscation u/s 111...

Quick Updates: