The ITAT, an Appellate Tribunal, considered a case regarding ...

Appellate Tribunal decision: Applicant trying to reargue case without showing any mistake. Tribunal findings stand. No manifest error found.

Case Laws Income Tax

June 20, 2024

The ITAT, an Appellate Tribunal, considered a case regarding rectification u/s 254 related to Compensation under BTALA. The Tribunal found the applicant's attempt for review without pointing out any error in the order as lacking merit. The Tribunal's original dismissal of the appeal was not to be reevaluated. Reference to CIT v/s D.P. Sandu Bros. Chembur Pvt. Ltd indicated that tenancy right surrender falls u/s 45 as capital gains, but was deemed irrelevant here. The applicant's delay in approaching the High Court and repeated adjournments weakened their position. The request for additional evidence was rejected due to lack of prescribed procedure. The applicant failed to identify any error in the order and merely reiterated previous arguments. The Tribunal concluded that the applicant's filing was not maintainable and dismissed it.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The ITAT, an Appellate Tribunal, considered a case regarding ...

Appellate Tribunal decision: Applicant trying to reargue case without showing any mistake. Tribunal findings stand. No manifest error found.

Case Laws Income Tax

June 20, 2024

You may also like:

Rectification application u/s 254 - Tribunal not followed the decision on the identical facts by the Coordinate Bench which is confirmed by this Court - The Court...

Doctrine of Merger of High Court Decision with the Order of Supreme Court - The Jharkhand High Court, in its analysis, delved into the doctrine of merger, a pivotal...

Principles of natural Justice - the order of Appellate Tribunal passed without dealing with any of the submissions made by the appellant - It is evident that the...

Rectification of mistake - CCIT cannot sit as an Appellate Authority over the decision of the Appellate Tribunal. The CCIT is bound by the decision of the Appellate...

Fixation of IRP fees - lack of earnestness and proficiency on the part of the IRP - The Appellate Tribunal finds that the IRP's fees were initially quoted at a higher...

The case before the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal in Chennai involved the classification of Compulsorily Convertible Debentures (CCDs) that do not require...

Rectification u/s 154 - The Assessee filed a rectification application, which was dismissed by the CIT(A) based on the assumption of Tribunal's adjudication on the issue....

Refund of Service Tax based on decision of SC on other case - ST on materials supplied free of cost - Limitation u/s 11B(1) of the Act - A plain reading of the provision...

The case involves contravention of Section 8(1) of FERA, 1973. The Appellate Tribunal held that the transfer of money from an NRE account, even if received in Indian...

Grant of pre-arrest bail - case of applicant is that the applicant raised several contentions in the applications filed by them, however, all the contentions are not...

Power of Tribunal when it disagree with earlier decision of Tribunal - there are only two methods to disagree is either the decision is per in-curium or the decision is...

The High Court considered a case involving professional misconduct u/s Clause (7) of the Chartered Accountants Act. The issue was the validity of the Appellate...

CESTAT, an Appellate Tribunal, addressed the issue of valuation of imported Slack Wax/Residue Wax. The Tribunal found no evidence to dispute the transaction value...

CESTAT, an Appellate Tribunal, addressed the taxability of Unincorporated Joint Ventures involving revenue sharing arrangements and support services of business or...

Contempt proceedings - The Tribunal (NCLT) and the Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) have the same ‘jurisdiction’, ‘powers’ and ‘Authority’ in respect of contempt of it as the...

Quick Updates: