Petition challenging validity of reopening assessment u/s 148 ...

Reopening tax assessment challenged, dismissed - no apparent error to review.

Case Laws Income Tax

September 19, 2024

Petition challenging validity of reopening assessment u/s 148 dismissed. No final order passed, jurisdictional issue raised for first time in review petition. Statutory remedy available, High Court cannot interfere under Article 226. No apparent error on record to interfere with writ order. Review petition cannot repeat old, overruled arguments or reopen conclusions. Grounds for review under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC not made out. Supreme Court held review requires demonstrating error apparent on record, not error to be searched for. Mere erroneous decision cannot be reviewed. No error apparent warranting interference.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Petition challenging validity of reopening assessment u/s 148 ...

Reopening tax assessment challenged, dismissed - no apparent error to review.

Case Laws Income Tax

September 19, 2024

You may also like:

Seeking review - error apparent on the face of record or not - The High Court held that, these documents were not part of the pleadings. Review does not mean rehearing...

Review petition - Validity of reopening of assessment - The High Court dismissed the review petitions seeking to challenge a common order dated 04.11.2022, which set...

A review application is maintainable on (i) discovery of new and important evidence which could not be produced earlier despite due diligence, (ii) mistake or error...

Rectification of assessment orders to correct the errors apparent on the face of record u/s 161 of DGST GST Act, 2017. - The instruction issued by the Department of...

Review petition dismissed for lack of grounds permissible under law. Court found no mistake or error apparent on record to warrant review of the impugned order passed...

The case involves a review petition filed in the Madhya Pradesh High Court seeking to recall an order that dismissed an appeal due to the absence of substantial...

Second SCN issued pending adjudication of first SCN subsequently withdrawn - jurisdiction of first SCN challenged - withdrawal of first SCN after issuance of second SCN...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Period of limitation - The audit party is entitled to point out a factual error or omission in the assessment. reopening of the...

Validity of reopening of assessment - It is well settled Law that validity of the reassessment proceedings is to be judged with reference to the reasons recorded for...

Review petition - error on record - power to correct - earlier judgment suffers from error apparent on the face of record and is liable to be recalled/reviewed. The...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 was challenged. The Assessing Officer (AO) had disallowed 20% of total sundry creditors in the regular assessment u/s 143(3). The AO...

Validity of reopening of assessment - clandestine and unaccounted sales - The High Court reviewed a petition challenging the rejection of objections to a notice for...

Reopening of assessment - Denial of natural justice - non considering assessee stand - The correctness of order under Section 148A(d) is being challenged on the factual...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - notice under Section 148A(b) - The correctness of order under Section 148A(d) is being challenged on the factual premise contending...

The case involves a challenge to a refund claim for service tax u/s unjust enrichment principles. CESTAT held that refund can only be granted based on the assessment...

Quick Updates: