CESTAT, an Appellate Tribunal, addressed the issue of denying ...

Tribunal Overturns Decision on Duty Exemption; Rules Goods Misclassified, Grants Exemption Benefits as Per Amended Notification.

June 22, 2024

Case Laws Customs AT

CESTAT, an Appellate Tribunal, addressed the issue of denying exemption from duty on the import of specific goods due to a realignment of tariff headings. The Tribunal found that the goods were cleared without the benefit of the Notification due to incorrect tariff entry. The Commissioner's decision to deny the benefit based on the Corrigendum being prospective was deemed erroneous. The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the Commissioner's order and granting the benefit of the amended Notification.

View Source

← Previous Next →

CESTAT, an Appellate Tribunal, addressed the issue of denying ...

Tribunal Overturns Decision on Duty Exemption; Rules Goods Misclassified, Grants Exemption Benefits as Per Amended Notification.

June 22, 2024

Case Laws Customs AT

You may also like:

Classification of imported goods - Narrow Woven Fabric Webbing - The tribunal noted that the appellant's actions in misclassifying goods from a specific country...

Reversal of Cenvat Credit - Scope of exemption notification - Notification exempting the basic excuse duty but not additional duty of excise - As per Rule 2(d),...

The case involves a dispute over whether imported goods qualify as 'Capital Goods' for exemption under a customs notification. The Revenue alleged that the imports did...

Taxability - Indian Made Foreign Liquor - The intention of the rule maker is that the tax is paid only once. It is held that it becomes a tax free good and as the words...

Seeking Permission to abandon the goods and remission of duty - The case involved the misdeclaration of goods where the appellant received Stone Chips instead of...

Adjustment of excess service tax paid with subsequent service tax liability - case of Revenue is that Rule 6 (3) of Service Tax Rules, 1994 do not provide for such...

Excise duty remission granted for goods destroyed by unavoidable fire accident as per Rule 21 of Central Excise Rules, 2002. Reversal of CENVAT credit on inputs used in...

The CESTAT ALLAHABAD ruled on the classification of Colour Television Sets in SKD condition, holding that incomplete parts cannot be classified as CTVs. The decision was...

Recovery of duty drawback already granted - mechanism is absent in Duty Drawback Rules, 1995 thus demand under Rule 16 of Drawback Rules, 1995 is not sustainable.

The Appellate Tribunal considered whether the assessee, a trust registered u/s 12AA, qualified for exemption u/s 11 as a charitable entity. The AO argued the trust's...

The CESTAT Chandigarh, in a majority decision, in an appellate tribunal decision, allowed the appeal regarding the rejection of a refund claim for duty paid on outward...

The importer imported consignments of "Ground Colemanite (B2O3 40%) Natural Boron Ore" and claimed exemption from basic customs duty under relevant notifications. The...

The Appellate Tribunal addressed issues regarding the method of valuation of electrical motors, whether to apply Rule 8 or Rule 4 of the Central Excise (Valuation)...

The appellant, a 100% Export Oriented Unit (EOU), imported goods and stored them in a licensed warehouse u/s 58 of the Customs Act, 1962. These goods were destroyed in a...

Reversal of CENVAT Credit - the object of both the provisions is clear and the only difference is that Chapter X uses the word “remission” of duty on excisable goods”...

Quick Updates: