The Appellate Tribunal addressed issues regarding the method of ...

Valuation of electrical motors for captive use clarified. No suppression of facts found. Time limitation and cum-duty benefit upheld.

Case Laws Central Excise

June 5, 2024

The Appellate Tribunal addressed issues regarding the method of valuation of electrical motors, whether to apply Rule 8 or Rule 4 of the Central Excise (Valuation) Rules, 2000. Following the precedent set by a Larger Bench decision, the Tribunal upheld the demand for valuation based on the spares market for all clearances, including captive consumption and warranty replacements. Regarding time limitation and cum-duty benefit, the Tribunal found no intentional suppression of facts, as the issue was not without controversy. The Tribunal noted that the original show-cause notice did not allege suppression, and since all assemblies were dutifully disclosed, willful suppression could not be claimed. The Tribunal upheld demands within the normal period, extended cum-duty benefit, set aside penalties under Section 11AC, and remanded the matter for duty recomputation.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The Appellate Tribunal addressed issues regarding the method of ...

Valuation of electrical motors for captive use clarified. No suppression of facts found. Time limitation and cum-duty benefit upheld.

Case Laws Central Excise

June 5, 2024

You may also like:

Invocation of extended period of limitation - wilful suppression of facts - Even suppression of facts has to be wilful and in any case, suppression has also to be with...

Refund of service tax paid - entitlement for Cenvat credit of the service tax paid on the ocean freight on the reverse charge mechanism - rejection of refund on the...

Extended period of limitation - Suppression of facts or not - The returns contained all the requisite details as that of the invoice numbers, the amount of invoice, the...

CENVAT Credit - Rule 9(1)(bb) - duty paying invoices - it is clear that the department has accepted that there is no suppression of facts. To establish suppression of...

Mere non-payment of duties is not collusion or willful misstatement or suppression of facts - Article

Extended period of limitation - The very fact that the appellant is contesting the issue of invoking larger period of limitation, that the rendering of service under the...

Valuation - captive consumption, though not for production or manufacture of other articles - Valuation to be made under Rule 8 read with Rule 11 of valuation rules - AT

Valuation - Clearances of yarn for captive consumption within the factory - where the goods manufactured by an assessee are cleared for captive use as well as are sold...

Transfer of manufactured product to another unit - Captive Consumption – Rule 8 of Valuation @ 110%/115% of cost of production - the concept of revenue neutrality is not...

Taxability - advance payments - The Tribunal observed that the appellant failed to issue invoices/bills upon receiving payments for the services provided, as mandated by...

Extended period of Limitation - suppression of facts or not - The Tribunal observes that the dispute revolves around the classification of taxable services, which...

Refund of CENVAT credit of CVD and SAD paid by them - appellant has paid the duties only after issuing SCN - there is no allegation of any fraud, collusion or...

Penalty - Suppression of facts or not - Extend period of limitation - Service tax paid on Reverse Charge Mechanism and credit was availed even after issuance of SCN -...

Liability of tax - sale of motor bodies - component parts - The reference to Entry 18 of Notification No. 306 dated 29.01.2001 is found to be irrelevant, inasmuch as, by...

Assets leased out to various companies - Whether assets were in existence at the relevant time and whether the transactions in question were genuine or not - finding of...

Quick Updates: