The case involves the rejection of appeals without deciding on ...

Appeals was rejected without deciding merits. Appellant's right to fair assessment upheld. Remanded for proper review.

June 24, 2024

Case Laws Customs AT

The case involves the rejection of appeals without deciding on merits due to self-assessment discrepancies u/s 17(5) of the Customs Act, 1962. The appellant's claim under specific notifications was rejected, leading to duty payment under protest and appeal to the Commissioner(Appeals). The tribunal held that the appeals should have been decided on merits rather than rejected based on the assessment acceptance. Citing a Supreme Court ruling, it emphasized both parties' right to appeal an assessment order. The tribunal set aside the order, remanding the case for a merit-based decision by the Commissioner(Appeals) within three months. The appeal was allowed by way of remand.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The case involves the rejection of appeals without deciding on ...

Appeals was rejected without deciding merits. Appellant's right to fair assessment upheld. Remanded for proper review.

June 24, 2024

Case Laws Customs AT

You may also like:

The HC held that the Commissioner's order under Section 263 of the IT Act constituted an open remand, not a closed remand, as it set aside the assessment order and...

CIT(A) allowed assessee to withdraw appeal against section 263 revision order, stating Tribunal quashed section 263 order and CIT(A) erred in not deciding appeal merits....

The appeal challenged the legality of remanding the matter to the original authority and the legal authority of the Commissioner (Appeals) to do so during the relevant...

CESTAT allowed the appeal by way of remand. The appeal filed on 30.02.2019 was within one month of receipt of the order in original by the appellant. The Commissioner...

Refund of Service tax paid - time limitation - The Appellate Tribunal examined the submissions and found that the appellant had self-assessed and paid service tax...

The appellant's appeal against the rejection of chargeability of Clean Energy Cess on imported metallurgical coke was dismissed. The Bills of Entry were filed in January...

Revenue appeal - tax effect is below 2 lakhs - the facts and the issue involved in the appeals for the assessment years 200203 and 2003-04 are inter-linked with the...

Power of commissioner (appeals) to remand back the case - There are no piece of evidence to take a contrary view to the finding of the first appellate authority as to...

Condonation of delay in filing appeal - The correct date of communication of the Order-in-Original is on record i.e. 07.05.2019, it is clear that the Appeal though filed...

The HC determined that DRAT erred in remanding the matter to DRT for fresh consideration of jurisdiction and debt status under Section 2(g) of the Recovery of Debts and...

Evasion of GST - the police custody / remand of the petitioner - in the case on hand, the learned Magistrate, while rejecting the demand of remand in police custody, has...

Restoration of appeal - Dismissed by way of remand - Revenue's argument that the appeals are not dismissed and have been remanded with all issues open accepted and...

Appellant's refund claims for excess duty paid on CPC exports were rejected by CESTAT. The Shipping Bills had been finally assessed incorporating Cess/Cesses, but refund...

Maintainability of appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals) - reassessment of bill of entry - if an assessee wants to challenge the assessment of bill of entry, he...

Validity of remand order passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) - The tribunal found that the Commissioner (Appeals) erred in remanding the case without meeting specific...

Quick Updates: