The case involves the rejection of appeals without deciding on ...

Appeals was rejected without deciding merits. Appellant's right to fair assessment upheld. Remanded for proper review.

June 24, 2024

Case Laws Customs AT

The case involves the rejection of appeals without deciding on merits due to self-assessment discrepancies u/s 17(5) of the Customs Act, 1962. The appellant's claim under specific notifications was rejected, leading to duty payment under protest and appeal to the Commissioner(Appeals). The tribunal held that the appeals should have been decided on merits rather than rejected based on the assessment acceptance. Citing a Supreme Court ruling, it emphasized both parties' right to appeal an assessment order. The tribunal set aside the order, remanding the case for a merit-based decision by the Commissioner(Appeals) within three months. The appeal was allowed by way of remand.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The case involves the rejection of appeals without deciding on ...

Appeals was rejected without deciding merits. Appellant's right to fair assessment upheld. Remanded for proper review.

June 24, 2024

Case Laws Customs AT

You may also like:

CIT(A) allowed assessee to withdraw appeal against section 263 revision order, stating Tribunal quashed section 263 order and CIT(A) erred in not deciding appeal merits....

The appeal challenged the legality of remanding the matter to the original authority and the legal authority of the Commissioner (Appeals) to do so during the relevant...

Refund of Service tax paid - time limitation - The Appellate Tribunal examined the submissions and found that the appellant had self-assessed and paid service tax...

The appellant's appeal against the rejection of chargeability of Clean Energy Cess on imported metallurgical coke was dismissed. The Bills of Entry were filed in January...

Condonation of delay in filing appeal - The correct date of communication of the Order-in-Original is on record i.e. 07.05.2019, it is clear that the Appeal though filed...

Revenue appeal - tax effect is below 2 lakhs - the facts and the issue involved in the appeals for the assessment years 200203 and 2003-04 are inter-linked with the...

Power of commissioner (appeals) to remand back the case - There are no piece of evidence to take a contrary view to the finding of the first appellate authority as to...

Validity of remand order passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) - The tribunal found that the Commissioner (Appeals) erred in remanding the case without meeting specific...

Restoration of appeal - Dismissed by way of remand - Revenue's argument that the appeals are not dismissed and have been remanded with all issues open accepted and...

Maintainability of appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals) - reassessment of bill of entry - if an assessee wants to challenge the assessment of bill of entry, he...

The case involves timeliness of appeal filed u/s 85(3A) of Finance Act, 1994 before Commissioner (Appeals-II) and refund claim. The Appellate Tribunal found that the...

Power of tribunal to decide an appeal on merit without addressing the issue of pre-deposit - tribunal has committed an error - remanded back to Tribunal to be heard afresh - HC

Petitioners did not make required pre-deposit for maintaining appeal - appeal initially filed belatedly, defective and rejected without merits - subsequent appeal filed...

The Assessing Officer failed to pass a detailed speaking order explaining the rationale for enhancing the declared value of aluminum scrap imported by the respondent...

Appellate Tribunal held that service of order to a contract security person cannot be considered valid service u/s 37C(a), as he was not an authorized agent. Appellant...

Quick Updates: