Validity of remand order passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) - ...

Case Laws Customs

January 27, 2024

Validity of remand order passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) - The tribunal found that the Commissioner (Appeals) erred in remanding the case without meeting specific statutory conditions under Section 128A(3)(b) of the Customs Act, 1962. The tribunal set aside the impugned remand order and directed the Commissioner (Appeals) to re-examine and dispose of the matter afresh on merits, emphasizing the importance of adhering to legal provisions in appellate proceedings. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Validity of remand order passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) - ...

Case Laws Customs

January 27, 2024

You may also like:

The assessing officer (AO) exceeded jurisdiction by reclassifying income as fees for technical services (FTS) instead of royalty, contrary to the limited remand order...

Power of tribunal to decide an appeal on merit without addressing the issue of pre-deposit - tribunal has committed an error - remanded back to Tribunal to be heard afresh - HC

Validity of the order of ITAT - Matter remitted back to the file of the Assessing Officer for reconsideration by Tribunal - Bogus LTCG - There was no material, which...

Nature of non compete fee received by the assessee - CIT(A) has allowed relief to the assessee - Validity of ITAT order in remanding back the matter to CIT(A) - there...

Validity of remanding the matter to the Assessing Authority - the first appellate authority has adjudicated the controversy on merits and therefore, the tribunal, which...

Validity of order of the tribunal - The matter was heard by the Member (Judicial) of the Tribunal, however, the decision has been delivered by the Member (Technical) of...

The case involved a challenge to the validity of approval u/s 153D for assessment u/s 153A. The Appellate Tribunal found that the approval granted by the JCIT was...

CESTAT, an Appellate Tribunal, addressed the valuation of imported goods (ball valves/check valves/cartridges of brass). The rejection of declared value and...

The ITAT held that the CIT (A) erred in admitting additional evidence without following Rule 46A. Deletion of additions on forfeited amount and various expenses was...

Limited jurisdiction of trial court after remand order; cannot enlarge scope beyond remand directions. Trial court erred in allowing evidence beyond remand's limited...

Power of commissioner (appeals) to remand back the case - There are no piece of evidence to take a contrary view to the finding of the first appellate authority as to...

Non adjudication of grounds by tribunal - Liability of TDS u/s 194C - Tribunal ought to have rendered a finding on the grounds raised by the assessee with regard to the...

Validity of reopening of assessment - Approval of PCIT u/s 151 - The Tribunal acknowledged the Assessee's argument regarding the mechanical approval granted by the PCIT....

Quantum of penalty - Tribunal erred in reducing the amount of penalty - Tribunal, failed to take into consideration the law laid down in the case of Dharamendra Textile...

The case involved operating a duty-free shop without the required Special Warehouse Licence, leading to illegal sales of duty-free goods. The appellant was initially...

Quick Updates: