The Appellate Tribunal reviewed a case involving a revision u/s ...

ITAT ruled in favor of the assessee, finding no prejudice to revenue due to revenue recognition and stock valuation methods.

Case Laws Income Tax

June 26, 2024

The Appellate Tribunal reviewed a case involving a revision u/s 263 related to errors in revenue recognition methods. The Commissioner has the authority to examine and rectify orders if they are deemed erroneous and prejudicial to revenue. The Tribunal cited the Malabar Industrial Co. Ltd case, emphasizing the need for both conditions to be met for invoking section 263. In this instance, as there was no revenue prejudice due to the taxpayer's methods of revenue recognition and valuation of closing stock, the Tribunal found no basis for revision u/s 263. The assessment order was restored, and the Commissioner's order was set aside. The Tribunal allowed the taxpayer's appeal.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The Appellate Tribunal reviewed a case involving a revision u/s ...

ITAT ruled in favor of the assessee, finding no prejudice to revenue due to revenue recognition and stock valuation methods.

Case Laws Income Tax

June 26, 2024

You may also like:

Addition on account of revenue recognition following percentage of completion method (POCM) - as per AO assessee had incurred substantial expenses on construction but...

Unearned revenue from subscription services - AO has clearly erred in changing consistently followed method of revenue recognition adopted by the assessee.We find due...

The ITAT addressed various issues including disallowance u/s 14A r.w.r.8D, where Revenue challenged deletion of disallowance made by AO. ITAT upheld CIT(A)'s decision,...

The High Court held that once the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) found no cogent or convincing evidence from the Revenue to allege bogus purchases, it was wrong to...

The assessee had demonstrated the genuineness of the share transaction resulting in long-term capital gains, which were claimed as exempt u/s 10(38). The Revenue...

Validity of the order of ITAT deleting the various additions made by the AO - The appellant, Revenue, contested various additions made by the Assessing Officer,...

Offshore unit in Dubai treated as proprietary concern, profits taxable in assessee's hands. AO's addition disallowed based on ITAT's consistent rulings favoring assessee....

In a recent High Court case, the issue of whether advertisement expenditure could be considered as allowable revenue expenditure was discussed. The ITAT allowed the...

Faceless assessment regime mandated u/s 151A - Jurisdictional Assessing Officer not permitted to issue notice u/s 148, as it would breach Section 151A provisions - No...

Penalties levied u/ss 271D and 271E were challenged. The assessee was found to have violated Sections 269SS and 269T. However, there was no concrete finding that the...

The ITAT considered a case involving Penalty u/s 271B for not auditing books as per section 44AB. The Assessee argued books were not updated by the due date for audit...

The assessee delayed filing an appeal against an order dismissing their appeal contesting the assessment u/s 143(3), resulting in a 346-day delay. The ITAT held that...

The case pertains to the treatment of income received from an arbitral award in the assessment year. The AO passed an assessment order u/s 143(3) after the case was...

The ITAT ruled on the addition u/s 68 of share capital/premium from three dummy entities related to RPS Group. The addition was substantive for RPS Group and protective...

Revision u/s 263 - Method of accounting adopted for revenue recognition of the project - The Tribunal decided that the Pr.CIT erred in directing the AO to reassess based...

Quick Updates: