Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Customs - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights June 2024 Year 2024 This

The Appellate Tribunal considered the maintainability of an ...


The Tribunal said appeal not valid due to low duty amount below Rs.50 lakhs. Follow CBIC circular.

Case Laws     Customs

June 27, 2024

The Appellate Tribunal considered the maintainability of an appeal based on the monetary limit involved and the assessment made by the department. The Tribunal noted that circulars from the CBIC instructed the department not to file or pursue appeals before higher authorities if the duty amount is below specified limits. In this case, the CBIC's circular set a monetary limit of Rs.50 lakhs for appeals before the CESTAT. The Tribunal referred to a Bombay High Court decision supporting the withdrawal of appeals falling below monetary thresholds. As the duty amount in the appeal was below the prescribed limit, the Tribunal found the appeal not maintainable and dismissed it in line with the CBIC's circular.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. The appeals filed by the department were dismissed as the duty amount involved in each appeal was below the prescribed threshold limit of Rs. 50 lakhs, as per the...

  2. The case involves an appeal before the CESTAT challenging an assessment that led to an enhancement of value accepted by the importer. The CBIC's circular dated...

  3. The CESTAT Chandigarh addressed the maintainability of appeals below the monetary threshold limit set by CBIC circulars. The tribunal emphasized the binding nature of...

  4. In the case before CESTAT Chandigarh, the issue revolved around the monetary limit for filing appeals by the Revenue Department as per CBIC circulars. The latest...

  5. Income Tax: Amendment to section 194-IA of Income Tax Act clarifies that for TDS on transfer of immovable property, the consideration shall be aggregate of amounts paid...

  6. The court held that the tax liability arising from the deletion of additions under the remand order would be less than Rs. 1,00,00,000, rendering the appeal...

  7. Appellate Tribunal reduced penalty imposed on company u/s 50 of FERA, 1973 from Rs.2 crores to Rs.2.5 lakhs for contravention regarding two foreign exchange remittances...

  8. Service tax recovery from foreign government agencies for statutory fees/licenses - Petitioner's declaration under SVLDRS rejected - HC held pre-deposit amount during...

  9. Income Tax: To facilitate ease of doing business and reduce compliance burden, it is proposed to amend section 197 to bring section 194Q (tax deduction on purchase of...

  10. Reopening of assessment - Scope of new section/regime u/s 148A - Sense that one gets upon a holistic reading of the backdrop in which the new regime for reopening...

  11. Rejection of declared transaction value under Valuation Rule 12, re-determination of value under Valuation Rules 4-9. Commissioner followed Rule 9, adopted actual values...

  12. Contravention of Sections 8(1) and 9(1)(f)(i) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 - receiving foreign exchange payments in 1996-97 through fake export documents...

  13. The appellate tribunal examined the penalty imposed on the company and individual for contravention of Section 6(3)(a) of FEMA and Regulations 5, 6, and 13 of the...

  14. Clandestine removal of goods denied CENVAT credit. Liability for duty, interest, and penalty from FY 2007-08 to 2011-12 assessed. Differential duty demand of Rs....

  15. The case involved a violation of the FEMA Act due to accepting and placing bets on cricket matches for clients. The appellant was linked to the raided premises where...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates