The High Court addressed the issue of whether the Tribunal could ...

The court ruled in favor of refunding the amount without delay, dismissing the revenue's appeal.

Case Laws Customs

June 27, 2024

The High Court addressed the issue of whether the Tribunal could uphold the refund granted by the Commissioner, despite setting aside the cost recovery charges demand. The Court held that the appellate-revenue must adhere to the Circular issued by the Central Board of Excise & Customs, which mandates granting refunds arising from adjudication orders without a stay order after three months. The Tribunal relied on this Circular to reject the revenue's appeal against the Commissioner's refund decision. The Court found no merit or substantial legal questions in the appeal and dismissed it.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The High Court addressed the issue of whether the Tribunal could ...

The court ruled in favor of refunding the amount without delay, dismissing the revenue's appeal.

Case Laws Customs

June 27, 2024

You may also like:

The CESTAT examined the applicability of the doctrine of unjust enrichment u/s 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944, for refund claims. It held that Rule 6(3) of the CCR...

Condonation of delay in re-filing appeals by revenue rejected - Delay of three years - Delays by government departments due to impersonal official machinery not accepted...

Interest on delayed refund - if Revenue is of the view that this amount could not be collected at that stage, the Revenue was free to refund the said amount but the...

Interest on delayed refunds - revenue would be obliged to pay under interest for the delayed refund as contemplated u/s 11BB even for the delayed refund of the...

Interest u/s 244A on delayed refund - the interest on the delayed refund becomes part of the principle amount and the delayed interest includes the interest for not...

Refund of amount of mandatory pre-deposit - adjustment/set off the amount of refund against the arrears towards assessee - There exist no other provision in the Act...

The case involved a dispute over a refund claim u/s 11B of the Central Excise Act. The Appellate Tribunal held that the time limitation for filing the refund claim did...

Maintainability of appeal against order under CGST/SGST Act adjudication on refund application dismissed. Appellant had option to pay amounts demanded or contest seizure...

Interest on delayed refund of IGST paid on export of the goods along with duty drawback - The refund of the petitioner was withheld for almost six months and after six...

Refund of CENVAT Credit - alleged lack of nexus - The procedure for claiming such refund, enshrined in notification no. 27/2012-Central Excise Act, 1944 (NT) dated 18th...

Recovery of Refund - The original orders passed by the adjudicating authority in sanctioning the refunds in favour of the appellants were not challenged by Revenue...

The appellant sought refund of Countervailing Duty (CVD) and Special Additional Duty (SAD) paid in cash u/s 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944 read with Section 142(3)...

Delay in issuing Refund under Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme 2020 - interest on delayed refund - Despite the issuance of Form No. 5, the refunds for the Assessment...

Refund - non-supply of documents/ information by the appellant to the Revenue to ascertain appellant’s eligibility to refund claim under Rule 5 of the CENVAT Credit...

Refund of service tax paid - delay in filing refund claim - time limitation - it is found that the appellant was confused in so far as they believed that the refund is...

Quick Updates: