The case involved rectification of a mistake u/s 154 for denial ...

Exemption u/s 11: The mistake of classification of income was rectified u/s 154 resulting in exemption approval.

Case Laws Income Tax

June 27, 2024

The case involved rectification of a mistake u/s 154 for denial of exemption u/s 11. The appellant mistakenly classified income as "business income" instead of "income from other sources," resulting in denial of exemption. The appellant rectified this by submitting a revised return within the prescribed time frame u/s 139(5), not as a Section 154 application. As no intimation u/s 143(1) was issued within the stipulated period, the revised return was deemed accepted. Even if treated as a Section 154 application, the CPC's failure to pass an order within six months led to deemed acceptance. The rejection of a second rectification application lacked justification as all necessary details were provided in the revised return. The tribunal directed the exemption u/s 11 to be granted.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The case involved rectification of a mistake u/s 154 for denial ...

Exemption u/s 11: The mistake of classification of income was rectified u/s 154 resulting in exemption approval.

Case Laws Income Tax

June 27, 2024

You may also like:

Rectification u/s 154 - Exemption u/s 11 - accumulation of income for charitable purpose - mistake apparent from the record - whether accumulation at 15% has to be...

Rectification u/s 154 - The ld. AR invited our attention in ITR 7 where it is mentioned that the correct figures in claim of section 11(1)(2) of the Act. The assessee...

Rectification of mistake u/s 154 - Though there is a remedy to revise the return but if the assessee could not revised its return of income within the period prescribed,...

Exemption u/s 11 was not claimed in original return due to auditor's mistake in Form No. 10B. Assessee rectified mistake by filing revised Form No. 10B. Statutory claim...

Rectification of a mistake apparent from the record u/s 154 of the Income Tax Act. The assessee had provided specific details and facts regarding the nature of alleged...

Revision u/s 263 - AO has totally overlooked that the assessee is not eligible for deduction u/s. 80IB(11) - The contention of the ld. A.R. that this is a mistake and it...

Rectification u/s 154 - Exemption u/s 11(2) - Accumulation of income - The Appellate Tribunal found merit in the appellant's contention regarding the amount to be...

Power of the AO to rectify mistake of his super senior officer u/s 154 - tax calculation mistake - hierarchy of the Departmental structure - AO is not validly entitled...

Rectification of mistake u/s 154 - period of limitation - intimation or deemed intimation u/s 143(1) - If we read that the limitation provided under section 154(7) is...

Prescribed time-limit of 6 months in passing order u/s 154(8) of Income-tax Act, 1961 to rectify any mistake apparent from record must be followed strictly.

Rectification of mistake u/s 154 - limited scrutiny of “Agricultural Income” - The High Court deliberated on the challenge to an Impugned Notice issued u/s 154 - It...

Rectification of mistake u/s 154 - period of limitation - the said order has not been passed to rectify any apparent mistake but was passed to give complete effect to...

Rectification of mistake u/s 154 - Debatable issue - it cannot be said that allowance of deduction of sales promotion expenses by the AO resulting in a mistake apparent...

Provision for loss on investment is not a revenue obligation for the year and not eligible for deduction u/s 37(1) of the Act. It represents a portion of investment...

Rectification u/s 154 - Deduction claimed u/s. 80IAB - Wrong classification of income under the head ‘income from house property’, has resulted in wrong claim of...

Quick Updates: