The Appellate Tribunal considered a case where disallowance of ...

The Tribunal ruled in favor of the taxpayer, allowing genuine deductions despite reporting errors in filing ITR.

Case Laws Income Tax

June 27, 2024

The Appellate Tribunal considered a case where disallowance of Gratuity u/s 43B was made due to a discrepancy in classification in the Income Tax Return and tax audit report. The Tribunal held that inadvertent errors in reporting, when details are available in the Return, are bonafide. Deductions based on genuine claims cannot be denied, even if reported in the wrong category. The Tribunal emphasized that legitimate deductions should be allowed to prevent over-assessment, notwithstanding errors by the assessee. Therefore, the Tribunal allowed the assessee's appeal, stating that the incorrect classification in the Return should not lead to denial of a valid deduction u/s 43B.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The Appellate Tribunal considered a case where disallowance of ...

The Tribunal ruled in favor of the taxpayer, allowing genuine deductions despite reporting errors in filing ITR.

Case Laws Income Tax

June 27, 2024

You may also like:

Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - deduction u/s. 80GGC denied - second round of appeal - the Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the claim for deduction was...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal considered whether an assessee can claim deduction under Chapter VI-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the first time in the return...

The Appellate Tribunal addressed the claim of deduction u/s 32AD for additional investment allowance on an investment made in the financial year 2015-16. The issue arose...

The Appellate Tribunal addressed the issue of alleged bogus long-term capital gain u/s 10(38) concerning a transaction involving shares of a company flagged as a penny...

The Appellate Tribunal considered the disallowance of deduction claimed u/s 80-IA due to the assessee's failure to file Form no.10CCB on time. The Tribunal found that...

Enhancement made by the Ld. CIT(A) u/s 251(1) r.w.s. 56(2) (viib) - AO substituted fair market value determined by the assessee through his own valuation - Assessees...

Seeking release of the goods imported - betelnuts/supari described as Menthol Scented Sweet Supari (“goods”) - nature of the mix created - The petitioner sought...

Deduction u/s 80P - interest income - The tribunal noted that section 80P(2)(a)(i) allows deduction for cooperative societies engaged in banking or providing credit...

The Appellate Tribunal upheld the addition u/s 68 for alleged bogus Long Term Capital Gains due to off-market cash purchase of shares. The taxpayer's claim for deduction...

The ITAT, an Appellate Tribunal, ruled on unexplained cash deposits in bank accounts opened by a CA misusing KYC documents. The CA, acting fraudulently, used the...

The Appellate Tribunal considered a case involving a revision u/s 263 due to discrepancies in the assessment order, including undisclosed TDS, differences in purchases...

This is a summary of a case dealing with the determination of fair market value (FMV) for computing long-term capital gains (LTCG) and allowing deductions for cost of...

Levy of penalty u/s 129 (3) of the GST Act - Allegation that appellant/petitioner did not generate e-Way Bill with a view to evade tax - Despite the petitioner...

Smuggling of betel nut and black pepper of foreign origin - The Appellate Tribunal observed that while the ARDF report suggested the goods might be of Indonesian origin,...

The ITAT Ahmedabad considered a case involving exemption u/s 11 for a trust with a belatedly filed income return. The tribunal held that the trust, registered u/s 12AA,...

Quick Updates: