The case involves the retrospective application of the safe ...

Tribunal rules in favor of assessee on safe harbor limit u/s 50C, allowing retrospective application. CBDT acknowledges property value differences.

Case Laws Income Tax

June 28, 2024

The case involves the retrospective application of the safe harbor limit of 5% u/s 50C of the Income Tax Act, which addresses the difference between sale consideration and market value. The Tribunal held that the amendment introducing the safe harbor limit was curative of unintended consequences of anti-avoidance provisions. The CBDT recognized genuine variances in property values based on factors like location and facilities. The safe harbor limit was initially introduced in 2018 and enhanced in 2020, with the Tribunal ruling the 2020 amendment to apply retrospectively. Citing precedent, the Tribunal deemed the amendment retrospective to prevent unintended consequences, granting the assessee the benefit of section 50C and setting aside the addition.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The case involves the retrospective application of the safe ...

Tribunal rules in favor of assessee on safe harbor limit u/s 50C, allowing retrospective application. CBDT acknowledges property value differences.

Case Laws Income Tax

June 28, 2024

You may also like:

Safe Harbour Rule - Income-tax (18th Amendment) Rules, 2022 - Amends Rule 10TD - Notification

TP Adjustment - Eligible International Transaction - safe harbor rules - The court examined the eligibility of international transactions under Rule 10TC of the Income...

TP Adjustment - classification of the assessee as a KPO by applying safe harbor Rules - classification of the assessee as a KPO by applying safe harbor Rules is totally...

TP Adjustment - benchmarking the international transactions u/s 92CA(1) - Safe Harbour Rules - At the outset, we find that Safe Harbour Rules are applicable from...

The Appellate Tribunal addressed the issue of the retrospective or prospective application of amended provisions of Section 50C regarding Capital Gain computation....

Safe Harbour Rules for generation, transmission or distribution of electricity Notified vide Income-tax (2nd Amendment), Rules, 2015. - Notification

TP Adjustment - Safe Harbour Notification dated 18th September 2013 relied upon by the Revenue is prospective. Since, Safe Harbour Rules are not operative for the year...

After the petitioner exercised option for application of safe harbour rules in accordance with the provisions of rule 10THC the Assessing Officer passed no order under...

The ITAT Ahmedabad ruled on two key issues: 1) Determination of Selling Price of Shares for LTCG Calculation - Held that the AR's contention regarding higher...

Capital gain in respect of sale of only one property - addition u/s 50C - assessee itself had leasehold rights in the said property and hence in instant facts, the...

The case involved the scope of limited scrutiny and the validity of a notice u/s 143(2) of the Income Tax Act. The assessee's case was selected for limited scrutiny to...

The assessee, after being amalgamated with another company, treated the excess consideration paid over the net assets acquired as goodwill and claimed depreciation at...

Filing of Form GST TRAN-1 - time limit for filing of the form - The time limit stipulated under Rule 117 of the Rules is not ultra vires of the Act. This Rule is...

Addition u/s 56(2)(x) arises when consideration paid for immovable property is less than stamp duty value by more than Rs. 50,000 or 10% of consideration. If agreement...

The Appellate Tribunal considered a case involving penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income. The Assessee did not disclose non-eligibility...

Quick Updates: