Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
IBC - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights July 2024 Year 2024 This

The NCLAT addressed the maintainability of a section 7 ...


NCLAT clarified that certain allottees must meet new criteria for filing insolvency under IBC. Allottees like appellants must adhere to rules. Appeal denied.

July 4, 2024

Case Laws     Insolvency and Bankruptcy     AT

The NCLAT addressed the maintainability of a section 7 application under the IBC, focusing on the threshold set by Amendment Act 1 of 2020. It was held that allottees, including those in the Assured Returns Class of Creditors, are covered under the definition of 'allottees'. The appellants, being part of this class, had to meet the threshold criteria introduced by the amendment, which they failed to do. The Adjudicating Authority correctly determined that the appellants, as allottees, must adhere to the second proviso of Section 7(1) of IBC. The appeal was dismissed as the appellants were deemed to still fall within the ambit of 'allottees' and were required to meet the threshold for filing a section 7 application.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Corporate Debtors failed to deliver housing units to allottees within stipulated time despite receiving payments. NCLAT rejected Corporate Debtors' contentions regarding...

  2. Admission of section 7 application - financial debt owed by the Corporate Debtor or not - Home Buyers - The application was filed by respondents, who were allottees in a...

  3. Locus standi of the appellant to file an appeal against the admission of a Section 7 application under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) and the fulfillment of...

  4. Condonation of delay in filing appeals - The NCLAT made it clear that ignorance of the proceedings or the order does not extend the limitation period for filing an...

  5. The NCLAT dismissed the appeal filed by the corporate debtor against the order admitting the application u/s 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) filed by the...

  6. The High Court ruled that security interests over assets of a corporate debtor to secure amounts due under a judgment or decree must give way to the provisions of the...

  7. The Tribunal examined the maintainability of an application for initiating the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) u/s 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code...

  8. Exclusion of commercial spaces from the assets of the Corporate Debtor and the entitlement of dissenting Financial Creditors u/s 30(2)(b) of the Insolvency and...

  9. The Tribunal dismissed the application filed by companies holding units in the Corporate Debtor's project, seeking to intervene and proposing a scheme of compromise and...

  10. The Supreme Court held that the lookback period for related party transactions u/s 43 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) is two years before the insolvency...

  11. NCLAT dismissed an appeal concerning pre-CIRP electricity dues, affirming NCLT's jurisdiction over post-resolution plan disputes under IBC Section 60(5). The Tribunal...

  12. Rejection of Section 10 application under IBC upheld as Appellant company filed it with unclean hands after evading Wilful Defaulter proceedings by Respondent Bank....

  13. Seeking condonation delay of 41 days in filing the present appeal - Sufficient reasons for delay or not - initiation of CIRP - Despite the appellant's claim of lack of...

  14. The NCLAT held that disputes related to shareholder oppression or mismanagement under the Companies Act are distinct from the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) and...

  15. Initiation of CIRP u/s 7 - classification of Commission on sales - Financial Debt or not - threshold limit - The Adjudicating Authority analyzed the definition of...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates