The NCLAT, an Appellate Tribunal, addressed a contempt petition ...

NCLAT addressed contempt petition on RP fees. Adjudicating Authority can set fees under CIRP Regulations. Financial Creditor to pay fees and expenses.

Case Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy

July 4, 2024

The NCLAT, an Appellate Tribunal, addressed a contempt petition regarding the determination of the Resolution Professional's (RP's) fees and expenses. The Appellate Tribunal held that the Adjudicating Authority has jurisdiction to determine the fees and expenses under Regulation 33(2) of CIRP Regulations 2016. The Adjudicating Authority complied with the Tribunal's direction to determine the fees. The Financial Creditor was directed to pay Rs. 7,30,000/- as RP's fee and Rs. 2,41,512/- as CIRP expenses, with a specific payment timeline. An uncalled-for direction was set aside, and the appeal was disposed of, emphasizing the Financial Creditor's liability to pay the determined amounts.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The NCLAT, an Appellate Tribunal, addressed a contempt petition ...

NCLAT addressed contempt petition on RP fees. Adjudicating Authority can set fees under CIRP Regulations. Financial Creditor to pay fees and expenses.

Case Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy

July 4, 2024

You may also like:

Section 7 application filed by the Financial Creditor was erroneously rejected by the Adjudicating Authority despite debt and default by the Corporate Debtor. The...

This summary concerns the maintainability of a fresh application u/s 94 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. The appellant had filed an application u/s 94 in 2020,...

While permitting withdrawal of Section 9 Application, Adjudicating Authority did not grant liberty to the Appellant to reapproach the Adjudicating Authority in the event...

The NCLT had directed the release of an industrial promotion subsidy claim amount to the Corporate Debtor, which was sanctioned prior to the commencement of CIRP. The...

The NCLAT addressed issues regarding the approval of a Resolution Plan by Suraksha Realty Limited, focusing on the treatment of claims filed in the CIRP of the Corporate...

Eligibility of ex-promoter/Corporate Debtor u/s 29A read with Section 240A of the IBC to submit a resolution plan claiming the benefits of MSME - rejection of Resolution...

Maintainability of CIRP application - NCLAT set aside the order of NCLT on the ground that applicant failed to prove that there was an outstanding amount - The NCLAT,...

Challenge to direction that entire cost be paid by the Applicant/Appellant - Admission of CIRP set aside - Corporate Debtor was NBFC - NCLAT observed that, in a...

Initiation of CIRP - Period of Limitation - Exclusion of certain period - NCLT rejected the application - The Adjudicating Authority has committed error in rejecting the...

Adjudicating Authority under FEMA - The High Court clarified that the Adjudicating Authority is not a persona designata, but a designation empowered by the Act. The...

CIRP proceedings - seeking payment of unpaid operational debt - Pre-existing dispute - The ‘Adjudicating Authority’ is not a Court of Law and the ‘CIRP’ is not an...

Fixation of IRP fees - lack of earnestness and proficiency on the part of the IRP - The Appellate Tribunal finds that the IRP's fees were initially quoted at a higher...

Initiation of CIRP - Corporate Debtor although once appeared before the Adjudicating Authority but neither filed any reply nor appeared thereafter and Adjudicating...

CIRP - Admission of Section 7 application - The NCLAT addressed the validity and impact of the ex parte arbitral award. It concluded that, irrespective of the award's...

The adjudicating authority can proceed with adjudication u/s 16(1) of FEMA during the pendency of an appeal against an order passed u/s 37A(1). Section 37A deals with...

Quick Updates: