Petitioner paid Rs. 8,46,84,821/- under Settlement Scheme for ...

Petitioner paid excess tax, Respondents illegally adjusted refund against non-existent demand. HC ordered refund of excess tax with interest.

Case Laws VAT and Sales Tax

July 17, 2024

Petitioner paid Rs. 8,46,84,821/- under Settlement Scheme for 2010-2011, against which Respondents recovered Rs. 19,16,74,501/-, resulting in excess collection of Rs. 10,69,89,606/-. Respondents adjusted Petitioner's refund of Rs. 10,69,89,606/- for 2011-2012 against non-existent demand for 2010-2011, without authority. Defect notice u/s 11 of Settlement Scheme was contrary to law as Petitioner made excess payment, not shortfall. Section 18 of Settlement Scheme, prohibiting refund, is inapplicable as Petitioner seeks refund of 2011-2012, not amount paid under Settlement Scheme. HC directed Respondents to refund Rs. 10,69,89,606/- with 6% interest from 1st June 2019 till payment date u/s 52 read with Rule 88 of MVAT Rules.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Petitioner paid Rs. 8,46,84,821/- under Settlement Scheme for ...

Petitioner paid excess tax, Respondents illegally adjusted refund against non-existent demand. HC ordered refund of excess tax with interest.

Case Laws VAT and Sales Tax

July 17, 2024

You may also like:

Refund claim - Adjustment of amount against outstanding demand - Refunds have been adjusted against the outstanding tax demand by the Authority without following the...

Refund of excess tax paid - The Assessing Officer committed a serious error in providing for adjustment of the excess tax against the demands for the later years. - The...

Eligibility to make adjustment of excess service tax paid against future service tax liability - Claim of Excess service tax paid due to issuance of revised invoice -...

Refund of adjustments made in excess of 20% of the disputed tax demands - s per mandate of law as well as the fact that refunds have been adjusted against outstanding...

Set off the excess entry tax paid - After verifying the total entry tax paid by the petitioner, for each of the assessment years referred, and the sales tax paid or set...

Revision u/s 264 - Refund of excess tax paid - Admittedly, petitioner has paid more capital gains than what should have been paid. Capital gains has to be calculated on...

This Court directed the respondents to process the petitioner's refund claims and grant a refund of the excess tax amount collected from the petitioner and deposited by...

Self adjustment of excess paid service tax - appellant already claimed the refund for excess amount adjusted against the service tax liability for the month of April,...

Refund adjustments against disputed tax demands - Non invoking Section 245 - no notice or opportunity of pre-decisional hearing had been provided to the petitioner prior...

Seeking service tax refund for payment of VAT liability - he petitioner had made the payment of the service tax for the periods in question voluntarily and had never...

Non-granting interest u/s 244A on excess self-assessment tax from January 2017 to October 2017 was denied, citing the refund was less than 10% of the tax determined in...

Demand of interest - assessee sought adjustment of refunds due to the petitioner against the outstanding demands u/s 245 - Revenue directed to adjust the refund with the...

The petitioners sought transfer of unutilized input tax credit available in their ledgers as on 02.06.2014 to the AP GST regime. The court held that Section 56 of the...

Adjustment excess tax paid under Rule 6(3) - first service tax was paid but later adjusted on the ground that other party is liable to pay service tax - stay granted - AT

Service tax demand on Goods Transport Agency (GTA) services rendered on reverse charge basis set aside as appellant did not collect service tax from service recipient....

Quick Updates: