Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights July 2024 Year 2024 This

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 was invalid as there was no ...


Reopening assessment invalid due to no non-disclosure by assessee. Purchases from GST non-filers already examined & accepted earlier.

Case Laws     Income Tax

July 18, 2024

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 was invalid as there was no failure by the assessee to disclose material facts. The assessment was reopened solely based on information that some parties from whom the assessee made purchases were non-filers of GST. However, the purchases were already examined and accepted in the original assessment order u/s 143(3). The Appellate Tribunal held that there was no document or evidence revealing any income chargeable to tax that had escaped assessment. Since the time limit for reopening had expired and the first proviso to Section 147 was not satisfied, the reopening itself was bad in law and quashed. The assessment order was quashed, and the assessee's appeal was allowed.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Reopening of assessment after four years is invalid as the recorded reasons do not mention any failure by the assessee to fully and truly disclose all material facts...

  2. The Appellate Tribunal examined the reopening of assessment after four years and the addition u/s 68 of the Income Tax Act. It held that the original assessment was...

  3. The assessment order was challenged on the grounds of validity of reopening after four years, based on a change of opinion and borrowed satisfaction. The assessee...

  4. Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - assessment after 4 years - reason to suspect OR reason to believe - Reopening of assessment which is already concluded under Section...

  5. Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Unexplained loan - There were no justification for the A.O. to record non-existing, incorrect and wrong facts in the reasons for...

  6. Validity of reopening assessment challenged due to non-disposal of objections raised by assessee against reassessment. Deduction u/s 24(a) proposed to be disallowed....

  7. Validity of reopening assessment u/s 147 - the reopening of assessment made by the AO on irrelevant facts and on a mere reason to suspect cannot survive. We hold that...

  8. The Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) considered the validity of reopening an assessment where the assessee's objections were not addressed. The power to reopen assessment lies...

  9. Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - In case incorrect, wrong and non-existing reasons are recorded by the A.O. for reopening of the assessment and A.O. failed to verify...

  10. Reopening of assessment - assessments based on receipt of certain information from Investigation Wing invalid due to non application of mind by the A.O - AT

  11. Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - ‘reasons to believe’ and ‘reasons to suspect’ - Merely on the basis of suspicion observed that the aforesaid entry might be a bogus...

  12. Reopening of assessment u/s 147 was based on reasons to believe the difference between total cash sales and cash sales reflected in books. Held: Reopening was made only...

  13. Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - sufficiency or inadequacy of reasons - There is no whisper in the impugned order as regards any failure on the part of petitioner to...

  14. Validity of reopening of assessment - It is well settled Law that validity of the reassessment proceedings is to be judged with reference to the reasons recorded for...

  15. Notice issued by Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (JAO) instead of Faceless Assessment Officer (FAO) u/s 148A(b) for income escaping assessment is invalid. Faceless...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates