Reopening of assessment for bogus purchases was upheld as the ...

Court Upholds Reassessment for Bogus Purchases; Deletes Unexplained Loans u/s 69; Rejects Penny Stock Additions.

July 23, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Reopening of assessment for bogus purchases was upheld as the Assessing Officer had credible information of money laundering and foreign outward remittances by entities with whom the assessee had transactions. Estimation of income from bogus purchases was sustained at 6% following judicial precedents. Addition u/s 69 for unexplained loans given was deleted as the advances were duly recorded in books of account. Addition of transactions in penny stocks was rejected as the investments were made from disclosed bank accounts and losses were incurred, following the reasoned decision of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals).

View Source

← Previous Next →

Reopening of assessment for bogus purchases was upheld as the ...

Court Upholds Reassessment for Bogus Purchases; Deletes Unexplained Loans u/s 69; Rejects Penny Stock Additions.

July 23, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

Key legal issues and the Tribunal's holdings: Agricultural land sold by assessee situated beyond municipal limits cannot be treated as capital asset u/s 2(14). Addition...

The assessing officer (AO) made additions to the assessee's income based on alleged bogus purchases and unexplained investments. The key points are: Addition of Rs....

Unsecured loans treated as unexplained cash credits u/s 68. Interest paid on such unexplained loans also added to income. Assessee's contention of repayment of loans...

The ITAT held: Long term capital gain was to be computed allowing deduction for indexed cost of acquisition and exemption u/s 54B. Addition u/s 68 for unexplained...

The case pertains to the estimation of income and disallowance of bogus purchases. The purchases were deemed sham transactions fabricated through bogus paper concerns...

Estimation of income - bogus purchases - The Tribunal considered the facts surrounding the alleged bogus purchases. Despite the inability of the assessee to establish...

The High Court rejected the application for grant of anticipatory bail filed by the applicants u/s 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The Court held that the...

Distinction between Section 69 and Section 56(2) regarding unexplained investment and gift. Section 69 requires the Assessing Officer to establish that the assessee made...

Unexplained investment - Additions u/s 69 - source of purchase of party - AO having not discharged onus for proving the satisfaction of the condition for application of...

Addition u/s 69 - unexplained investment made in purchase of land - no asset came into existence in the name of the assessee, which requires to be shown in the books of...

The High Court upheld the validity of reassessment u/s 153C and rejected the contention of reopening assessment u/s 147. The Assessing Officer relied on the material...

Loss in respect of embezzlement of stock by an employee - loss of jewellery/stock is allowed as the assessee substantiated its claim and filed relevant evidence proving...

Unexplained investment/unexplained cash credit under section 68 & 69 - no addition is called for on account of baseless allegation of unexplained investment by the...

Additions towards Bogus purchases - Estimation of profit - Purchases are to be removed, the corresponding sale is also required to be removed from the profit and loss...

Unexplained investments u/s 69 - details & proof filed before CIT(A) - the alleged purchase of flat have been recorded in the regular books of accounts along with...

Quick Updates: