The ITAT held: Long term capital gain was to be computed ...

Tax Tribunal Rules for Assessee: Deductions Allowed, Unexplained Investments Cleared, Creditor Disallowance Rejected.

January 6, 2025

Case Laws Income Tax AT

The ITAT held: Long term capital gain was to be computed allowing deduction for indexed cost of acquisition and exemption u/s 54B. Addition u/s 68 for unexplained investment in immovable property was deleted as assessee furnished sufficient evidence regarding source. Addition u/s 69 for unexplained investment was also deleted as source for purchase of property from sale proceeds was duly explained. Disallowance of sundry creditors was rejected as assessee proved genuineness and creditworthiness of lenders. Order was decided in favour of assessee.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The ITAT held: Long term capital gain was to be computed ...

Tax Tribunal Rules for Assessee: Deductions Allowed, Unexplained Investments Cleared, Creditor Disallowance Rejected.

January 6, 2025

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

ITAT rejected the assessee's claim for deduction under Section 80IA, determining that the appellant did not qualify as a "developer" or "contractor" for infrastructure...

Adjustment of excess service tax paid with subsequent service tax liability - case of Revenue is that Rule 6 (3) of Service Tax Rules, 1994 do not provide for such...

HC held that the investment write-off claimed as a tax deduction was valid. The investment was made in furtherance of the company's memorandum of association objectives...

The ITAT Chennai ruled on LTCG deduction u/s 54, stating that investment in more than one property is not allowed. Assessee invested in two distinct properties in...

The Appellate Tribunal considered the legality of additions based on a diary seized from a third party. The Tribunal held that the presumption u/s 132(4A) of the Act...

The Appellate Tribunal addressed the claim of deduction u/s 32AD for additional investment allowance on an investment made in the financial year 2015-16. The issue arose...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal considered whether an assessee can claim deduction under Chapter VI-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the first time in the return...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal held that the Assessing Officer had rightly formed a 'reason to believe' and not merely a 'reason to suspect' regarding escapement of...

The assessee claimed deduction u/s 80P(2)(d) of the Income Tax Act for interest income earned on deposits with a Cooperative Bank. The Assessing Officer and CIT(A)...

The ITAT Indore ruled on LTCG deduction u/s 54B for agricultural lands bought in the wife and family's names, but funded entirely by the assessee. Citing SHRI LAXMI...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) adjudicated on various additions made by the Assessing Officer (AO) as unexplained/bogus credits or trading liabilities. The...

The ITAT Delhi ruled on denial of deduction u/s 80G for donations made as part of CSR expenditure. The appellant suo-motu disallowed the donations u/s 37(1). The...

Disallowance of deduction claimed u/s 80P - interest and dividends received from investments made with DCCB - The appellate tribunal, in its detailed analysis, upheld...

Unexplained investment u/s 69 – Assessee paid up additional stamp duty on valuation - This by itself would not mean that the assessee made any unexplained investment - HC

The ITAT held that the order passed u/s 263 by the PCIT was in gross violation of the principles of natural justice. The Tribunal observed that the order disregarded the...

Quick Updates: