Rejection of declared F.O.B. value and imposition of penalty ...

Declared F.O.B. value rejected, penalty imposed u/ss 114(iii), 114AA upheld. Market enquiry conducted, appellant accepted re-calculated value. /s113

Case Laws Customs

July 29, 2024

Rejection of declared F.O.B. value and imposition of penalty u/ss 114(iii) and 114AA of Customs Act, 1962 upheld. Market enquiry conducted in presence of appellant's representative, who accepted re-calculated F.O.B. value. Appellant's representative admitted and agreed to value arrived during market enquiry u/s 108. Exporter participated in market enquiry with independent sellers and agreed to value arrived. Misdeclaration of quantity and value led to confiscation u/s 113(i),(ia),(ja). Overvaluation around 2.8 times justified penalty u/ss 114 and 114AA for intentional misdeclaration to avail undue export benefits. Impugned order affirmed, appeal dismissed.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Rejection of declared F.O.B. value and imposition of penalty ...

Declared F.O.B. value rejected, penalty imposed u/ss 114(iii), 114AA upheld. Market enquiry conducted, appellant accepted re-calculated value. /s113

Case Laws Customs

July 29, 2024

You may also like:

Absolute confiscation of counterfeit goods upheld as appellant relinquished title and claimed non-ownership. For other mis-declared goods, transaction value rejected u/r...

CESTAT Chennai held that penalty u/s 114 Customs Act was not imposed on Respondents for smuggling undeclared cigarettes concealed with gypsum plaster. Penalty was...

Levy of penalty under the wrong provisions of the act - proposes imposition of penalty u/s 114, 114A and 114AA of the Customs Act. Order-in-original has been passed...

Levy of penalty on CHA u/s 114 (iii) and Section 114AA respectively of the Customs Act, 1962 - allegation of abatement - fraudulent export to claim duty drawback - The...

Levy of penalty u/s 114(iii) of the Customs Act, 1962 and Section 114AA of the Customs Act, 1962 - export of goods at highly over invoiced values - availing undue export...

Sec 112 (a) of the Customs Act 1962 has been mentioned for imposing penalty in the SCN but Adjudicating authority has imposed penalty under Sec 114 without giving any...

Imposition of penalty u/s 114 of the Customs Act, 1962 on Customs Broker - undervaluation - in the guise of re-determination of value of goods, the Adjudicating...

Imposition of penalties u/s 114(iii) of the CA, 1962 - If the officers who are respondents herein had not examined the cargo are not associated with the said shipping...

Levy of penalty u/ss 114(i) and 114(iii) of the Customs Act without evidence of abetment in the export of red sanders. The appellant failed to obtain and verify the KYC...

Mis-declaration of quantity and value of goods in SEZ unit - penalty u/ss 112(a) and 114A of Customs Act 1962. Option for reduced 25% penalty u/s 114A to be extended if...

Levy of penalty u/s 114 (i) and u/s 114 AA of FA - Smuggling - red sanders - replacement of the goods enroute with red sander - penalty imposed only on ground that the...

Penalty u/s 114A and 114AA of Customs Act - providing wrong information in the course of business - The penalty imposed under Section 114AA and the penalty imposed under...

The CESTAT examined the overvaluation of goods case involving rejection of declared export value, re-determination of value, confiscation of goods, and penalties. The...

Levy of penalty u/s 114(i) of the Customs Act, 1962 - Smuggling - The reason for imposing the impugned penalty is that the appellant has not verified the Let Export...

Levy of penalty u/s 114 (iii) and Section 114AA of the Customs Act, 1962 - To constitute a criminal offence of abetment as punishable as defined under Section 107 of...

Quick Updates: