Rejection of declared F.O.B. value and imposition of penalty ...

Declared F.O.B. value rejected, penalty imposed u/ss 114(iii), 114AA upheld. Market enquiry conducted, appellant accepted re-calculated value. /s113

Case Laws Customs

July 29, 2024

Rejection of declared F.O.B. value and imposition of penalty u/ss 114(iii) and 114AA of Customs Act, 1962 upheld. Market enquiry conducted in presence of appellant's representative, who accepted re-calculated F.O.B. value. Appellant's representative admitted and agreed to value arrived during market enquiry u/s 108. Exporter participated in market enquiry with independent sellers and agreed to value arrived. Misdeclaration of quantity and value led to confiscation u/s 113(i),(ia),(ja). Overvaluation around 2.8 times justified penalty u/ss 114 and 114AA for intentional misdeclaration to avail undue export benefits. Impugned order affirmed, appeal dismissed.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Rejection of declared F.O.B. value and imposition of penalty ...

Declared F.O.B. value rejected, penalty imposed u/ss 114(iii), 114AA upheld. Market enquiry conducted, appellant accepted re-calculated value. /s113

Case Laws Customs

July 29, 2024

You may also like:

Absolute confiscation of counterfeit goods upheld as appellant relinquished title and claimed non-ownership. For other mis-declared goods, transaction value rejected u/r...

Rejection of declared transaction value under Valuation Rule 12, re-determination of value under Valuation Rules 4-9. Commissioner followed Rule 9, adopted actual values...

Levy of penalty on CHA u/s 114 (iii) and Section 114AA respectively of the Customs Act, 1962 - allegation of abatement - fraudulent export to claim duty drawback - The...

CESTAT Chennai held that penalty u/s 114 Customs Act was not imposed on Respondents for smuggling undeclared cigarettes concealed with gypsum plaster. Penalty was...

Levy of penalty u/s 114(iii) of the Customs Act, 1962 and Section 114AA of the Customs Act, 1962 - export of goods at highly over invoiced values - availing undue export...

Levy of penalty under the wrong provisions of the act - proposes imposition of penalty u/s 114, 114A and 114AA of the Customs Act. Order-in-original has been passed...

Importation of an old and used car by misdeclaring it as new, resulting in undervaluation. Imposition of composite penalty u/ss 112(a), 112(b), and 114AA of the Customs...

Sec 112 (a) of the Customs Act 1962 has been mentioned for imposing penalty in the SCN but Adjudicating authority has imposed penalty under Sec 114 without giving any...

Imposition of penalty u/s 114 of the Customs Act, 1962 on Customs Broker - undervaluation - in the guise of re-determination of value of goods, the Adjudicating...

Customs authority rejected transaction value declared by importer and enhanced value based on email evidence and statement of partner admitting negotiated higher price....

Imposition of penalties u/s 114(iii) of the CA, 1962 - If the officers who are respondents herein had not examined the cargo are not associated with the said shipping...

Levy of penalty u/ss 114(i) and 114(iii) of the Customs Act without evidence of abetment in the export of red sanders. The appellant failed to obtain and verify the KYC...

Levy of penalties u/ss 122 and 129 of CGST/SGST Acts - expiry of e-way bill - mens rea in penalty imposition. Technically, violation of law by petitioner in transporting...

The CESTAT examined the overvaluation of goods case involving rejection of declared export value, re-determination of value, confiscation of goods, and penalties. The...

Levy of penalty u/s 114 (iii) and Section 114AA of the Customs Act, 1962 - To constitute a criminal offence of abetment as punishable as defined under Section 107 of...

Quick Updates: