Confiscation of export goods set aside by Appellate Tribunal. ...

Appellate Tribunal overturns export goods confiscation, accepts explanation for invoice mismatch, quashes redemption fine and penalty.

July 29, 2024

Case Laws Customs AT

Confiscation of export goods set aside by Appellate Tribunal. Exporter's explanation accepted regarding mismatch between goods and invoice. No deliberate mis-declaration found. Redemption fine and penalty imposed earlier quashed. Confiscation order unsustainable in absence of willful mis-classification or mis-declaration. Appeal allowed.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Confiscation of export goods set aside by Appellate Tribunal. ...

Appellate Tribunal overturns export goods confiscation, accepts explanation for invoice mismatch, quashes redemption fine and penalty.

July 29, 2024

Case Laws Customs AT

You may also like:

Re-export of confiscated goods - if the appellant does not choose to redeem the goods then the goods shall remain in India and cannot be re-exported - confiscation of...

The case involved a challenge to the imposition of penalties and confiscation of goods under the Customs Act, 1962. The Appellate Tribunal found that the penalties...

Confiscation of goods already exported - redemption fine in lieu of confiscation imposed - export of iron ore fines - Fe content of the iron ore fines - In a case where...

CESTAT ruled that pan masala and gutkha exports could not be classified as "prohibited goods" merely for non-declaration of technical characteristics of inputs on...

Export of Goods - Mis-declaration of Mud additive chemicals for oil well - Confiscation - The Tribunal found that the Commissioner's decision to confiscate the goods was...

Confiscation of export of prohibited goods - A plain reading of section 113(d) shows that ‘any goods attempted to be exported or brought within the limits of any customs...

Refund of CENVAT Credit - export goods or not - goods were cleared by the appellant, not for physical exports, but were cleared by them to their sister concern, who is...

Gross violation of CBEC instructions and the precedential value of CESTAT decisions. The Revenue filed an appeal before the first Appellate Authority without specifying...

Levy of penalty - existence of mens rea or not - The appellant's argument that they were unaware of the need for authorization and had exported similar goods for years...

The case involved confiscation of imported goods u/s 111(d) of CA 1962, re-exportation, redemption fine, and penalty u/s 112(a). Goods were imported in contravention of...

Seeking re-export of goods - Absolute confiscation of goods - breach of ‘intellectual property rights’ - The tribunal found that while the goods were correctly...

The case involved denial of benefit u/s N/N. 32/97-Cus for clearance of imported multi-color granite blocks due to not acquiring items free of cost. Commissioner...

Confiscation - fine - penalty - Mis-declaring the quantity of cigarettes imported under warehouse bill of entry for re-export purpose - The customs authorities...

Confiscation of goods - levy of penalty - export of Rice - misdeclaration of goods or not - once all the export documents were in the name of Iranian buyers there was no...

The case involved smuggling of 154 mobile phones, leading to absolute confiscation and penalty u/s 114 of the Customs Act, 1962. The Appellate Tribunal found that the...

Quick Updates: