Reassessment proceedings invalidated due to improper sanctioning ...

Reassessment invalid due to improper sanctioning authority. Principal Chief Commissioner's sanction mandatory for cases beyond 3 years.

August 3, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax HC

Reassessment proceedings invalidated due to improper sanctioning authority. Sanction accorded by Principal Commissioner instead of Principal Chief Commissioner as mandated for cases beyond three years u/s 151(ii). Proviso to Section 151 inserting revised sanctioning authorities effective April 1, 2023, inapplicable. Impugned order and notice quashed, decided in assessee's favor, following Siemens Financial Services Private Limited case.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Reassessment proceedings invalidated due to improper sanctioning ...

Reassessment invalid due to improper sanctioning authority. Principal Chief Commissioner's sanction mandatory for cases beyond 3 years.

August 3, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax HC

You may also like:

The HC quashed reassessment proceedings for AY 2016-17 initiated via notice u/s 148 issued on July 29, 2022. The Court found that since the reassessment action commenced...

The High Court examined the validity of reassessment notices issued u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act, considering the sanction requirement u/s 151 and the impact of the...

ITAT determined the assessment order under s.148A(d) for AY 2018-19 was invalid due to improper sanctioning authority approval. The order issued on 06.04.2022 received...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 was invalid due to lack of valid sanction as required u/s 151. The competent authority must independently apply its mind based on...

Reassessment u/s 147 - Sanction granted by the CIT u/s 151 - simply written “Yes I agree” which does not in any manner shed any light as to whether there was any...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - The Tribunal found the reassessment proceedings to be invalid due to the non-application of mind by the AO and lack of valid approval...

Reopening of assessment beyond three years requires sanction from Principal Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, whereas the assessee obtained sanction from Principal...

Reassessment proceedings u/s 148 were sought to be undertaken more than three years after the end of the relevant Assessment Year. Sanction was required to be granted...

Sanction by Principal Commissioner of Income Tax instead of Principal Chief Commissioner of Income Tax u/s 151(ii) for reassessment proceedings beyond three years from...

Reopening of assessment under old regime - scope of new regime - scope of TOLA - In this detailed judgement, the Court found that the notice issued under Section 148 was...

Delay of 294 days in filing Special Leave Petition deemed invalid. Reopening of assessment u/s 143(3) without proper sanction u/s 151(1) from competent authority. Income...

The ITAT held that the notice u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act was invalid and quashed it. For the relevant assessment year 2017-18, the time limit of three years lapsed on...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Fresh sanction under Section 151 - For a moment, even if accept Revenue’s contention that the present proceedings are continuation of...

The High Court held that the revisional authority's order placing the refund sanction order in abeyance u/s 108 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 was...

Sanction for initiation of criminal proceedings - the implementation of the Tax Legislation should be tax payers friendly and at the same time the tax evaders should not...

Quick Updates: