Sanction by Principal Commissioner of Income Tax instead of ...

Reassessment proceedings beyond 3 years invalid if sanction by lower authority. Order & notice quashed, following Siemens case.

August 6, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax HC

Sanction by Principal Commissioner of Income Tax instead of Principal Chief Commissioner of Income Tax u/s 151(ii) for reassessment proceedings beyond three years from end of assessment year is invalid. Consequent order u/s 148A(d) and notice u/s 148 are quashed and set aside. Decided in favor of assessee, following Siemens Financial Services Private Limited case.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Sanction by Principal Commissioner of Income Tax instead of ...

Reassessment proceedings beyond 3 years invalid if sanction by lower authority. Order & notice quashed, following Siemens case.

August 6, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax HC

You may also like:

The HC quashed reassessment proceedings for AY 2016-17 initiated via notice u/s 148 issued on July 29, 2022. The Court found that since the reassessment action commenced...

Sanction by specified authority not obtained as per amended provisions of Section 151 for reopening assessment beyond 3 years, rendering impugned notice invalid;...

The High Court examined the validity of reassessment notices issued u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act, considering the sanction requirement u/s 151 and the impact of the...

The HC allowed the petition and set aside the impugned reassessment notice and subsequent proceedings. The AO's satisfaction note for invoking reassessment proceedings...

The High Court held that the reassessment order dated 12.05.2023 and subsequent proceedings were invalid as they were beyond the statutory limitation period prescribed...

Reassessment proceedings u/s 148 were sought to be undertaken more than three years after the end of the relevant Assessment Year. Sanction was required to be granted...

Validity of order passed u/ss 154/147/143(3) - Disallowance of prior period expenses - Relevant previous year being first year of assessee's business, no prior period...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - The Tribunal found the reassessment proceedings to be invalid due to the non-application of mind by the AO and lack of valid approval...

Validity of the assessment order passed u/s 147 r.w.s. 143(3) - post search assessment - in the case on hand the pending reassessment proceedings u/s 147 got abated by...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Earlier, ITAT remanded the matter back requesting the AO to provide reasons for initiating reassessment proceedings. - AO must have...

The ITAT held that the notice u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act was invalid and quashed it. For the relevant assessment year 2017-18, the time limit of three years lapsed on...

Reassessment proceedings invalidated due to improper sanctioning authority. Sanction accorded by Principal Commissioner instead of Principal Chief Commissioner as...

The High Court quashed the reassessment notices issued u/s 148 and the consequent initiation of reassessment proceedings, ruling in favor of the assessee. The key points...

Reassessment notices issued u/s 148 for assessment years 2018-19, 2019-20, and 2020-21 were time-barred by limitation. Withdrawal of approval u/s 10(23C)(vi) by the...

The ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal against the reopening of assessment u/s 147 beyond the four-year period. The Assessing Officer failed to record a finding that the...

Quick Updates: