Assessee, a non-resident Indian residing outside India for over ...

Indian Tax Tribunal Invalidates Reassessment Notice Due to Non-Resident Status and Jurisdictional Error in Capital Gains Case.

August 7, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Assessee, a non-resident Indian residing outside India for over 25 years, challenged the jurisdiction of Income Tax Officer (ITO), Ward 2(2), Ajmer to issue notice u/s 148 for reassessment proceedings. Evidence showed assessee's residential status as NRI on the date of notice issuance. Faceless Assessment Unit also acknowledged the case pertained to a non-resident individual, requiring assessment at the international charge. ITAT held ITO, Ward 2(2), Ajmer lacked jurisdiction when issuing the notice on 30.03.2022, rendering the reassessment proceedings invalid. Additionally, the Assessing Officer erroneously treated the entire sale consideration as Long Term Capital Gain without considering the original cost and evidence provided by the assessee, resulting in a perverse order, which ITAT quashed.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Assessee, a non-resident Indian residing outside India for over ...

Indian Tax Tribunal Invalidates Reassessment Notice Due to Non-Resident Status and Jurisdictional Error in Capital Gains Case.

August 7, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

ITAT invalidated reassessment proceedings due to jurisdictional defects in notice issuance under s.148. ITO Ward 3(2), Bulandsahar transferred assessee's records to ITO...

Income accrued in India - Status of Non Resident - Determinative test for the status of Non Resident being number of days of stay in India and in assessee's case in...

Validity of Proceedings u/s 144C - Eligible assessee - Original ITR filed declaring the status as "Resident" - In the revised ITR the status declared as "Non-Resident" -...

The assessee is a Non-Resident Indian and merely because there is a wrong description in the returns that he is a Resident, it would not alter the status of the assessee...

The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal u/s 249(4)(b) due to non-payment of advance tax. The assessee did not respond to the notice u/s 142(1) to clarify tax payment....

TDS liability u/s 195 - payments made to the non-residents / father of the non-resident - The entire payment was made to the resident Indian who is also the father of...

Rate of TDS - Non-availability of PAN - Benefit of treaty - in case of payments made to non-residents, the assessee was entitled to deduct taxes at source at the rates...

Non-payment of tax for Assessment Years 2005-06 and 2006-07 - Liability to pay interest u/s 234B. Prior to the insertion of proviso to Section 209(1), if the payer...

Liability to pay interest u/s 234B - In the light of legal position as it existed for the relevant Assessment Years prior to insertion of proviso to Section 209(1) of...

No doubt, if the person (payer) who had to make payments to the non-resident had defaulted in deducting the tax at source from such payments, the non- resident is not...

CBDT amended Income Tax Rules 1962 by introducing Rule 6GB u/s 44BBC, establishing conditions for non-resident cruise ship operators. The amendment specifies four key...

The ITAT ruled in favor of the non-resident Indian taxpayer, invalidating the reopening of assessment under section 147. The notice under section 148 was initially...

Validity of reassessment proceedings - non-issue of the statutory notice u/s 143(2) - The Appellate Tribunal found that the AO had not issued the statutory notice under...

Assessee employed by Indian entity but sent on long-term international assignment to Singapore. Salary received in India for administrative reasons, but employment...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that the reassessment notices issued u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act for the assessment years 2013-14, 2014-15, and 2015-16...

Quick Updates: