Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Customs - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights August 2024 Year 2024 This

The assessee-Respondent classified the aluminum circles under ...


Tribunal Upholds Aluminum Circles Classification; Revenue's Reclassification Appeal Dismissed Due to Lack of Evidence.

August 9, 2024

Case Laws     Customs     AT

The assessee-Respondent classified the aluminum circles under CTH 76069110 as raw materials, while the department proposed classification under CTH 7616, and the DRI suggested CTH 7615. The tribunal held that when revenue disputes classification, the burden is heavily on revenue to justify why the declared classification is wrong and why its proposed classification should be accepted. The revenue failed to provide evidence or dispute the assessee's contention and the chartered engineer's report that the articles were raw materials undergoing further processing. Rule 2(b) is applicable as heading 7616 does not require 'otherwise' for classification of material containing a combination of metals. Heading 7606 specifically mentions aluminum circles under 76069110, and since it is a composite product with predominant material being aluminum, by implication of Rule 2(b), it has to be classified as an aluminum circle. The department failed to make a case for interference with the First Appellate Authority's findings, and the classification of articles as confirmed in the impugned order was held to be in order. The appeal was dismissed.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. The Appellate Tribunal addressed the issue of classifying imported Zinc as unwrought/unrefined under a specific customs tariff heading. The Tribunal rejected the demand...

  2. The assessee, a company engaged in development/construction and sale of flats and plots, had classified its properties into four categories: flats open for sale, let-out...

  3. Levy of penalty - Bill of Entry for clearance of ‘Sweet Pearl P200’ classified under 29054900 - Revenue reclassified the goods under 21069060 - The burden of proof was...

  4. Classification of imported goods - Imports aluminium shelving for Mushroom - The Appellate Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant. They determined that the imported...

  5. Classification dispute regarding imported goods such as brake pads, mold tools, etc. Tribunal upheld classification under CTH 6813 8900, rejecting importer's claim for...

  6. Classification of goods - Fiber Aluminium Bobbins Dynamically Balanced - to be classified under chapter heading 3923.90

  7. Whether anti-dumping duty (ADD) is applicable on color coated aluminum coils imported as coated with Styrene/Butyl Methacrylate Copolymer, other than PE/PVDF. - The...

  8. The ITAT Ahmedabad addressed Transfer Pricing (TP) adjustments, focusing on royalty, management fees, and IT allocation costs. The tribunal upheld the use of the...

  9. The Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) addressed the issue of classifying imported goods as worn clothing under Customs Tariff Item No. 6309 90...

  10. Judgment of the Larger Bench of Tribunal on Aluminum dross and skimming – reg. - Order-Instruction

  11. Levy of penalty - Misclassification - nature of imported goods as Dried Garlic or not - Regarding the classification of the goods, the Tribunal upheld the appellant's...

  12. Assessee followed joint venture model for sharing revenue with collaborators as per franchise agreement. Assessee recorded all revenues, incurred expenditure, and shared...

  13. CESTAT ruled on classification dispute regarding parts of Self-Loading Concrete Mixtures (SLCM). The appellant, both importer and manufacturer of SLCM, had Central...

  14. CIRP - Classification of the claim - Claim as contingent due to pending litigation - Citing legal precedent, the Tribunal upheld the classification of the claim at a...

  15. Classification of imported goods - Encoder/Multiplexer under different Model - the Tribunal held that the goods are correctly classifiable under CTH 85 17 6290. - The...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates