Condonation of delay in filing the appeal was denied as the ...

Delay in appeal filing denied; prerequisites unfulfilled. Negligence, not jurisdictional defect. Visa Steel case distinguished. 209 days delay exceeds 15 days limit. Appeal dismissed.

August 10, 2024

Case Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy AT

Condonation of delay in filing the appeal was denied as the appellant failed to fulfill the prerequisites for invoking Section 14 of the Limitation Act. The court held that the appellant was guilty of negligence, lapse, or inaction, and there was no jurisdictional defect or similar cause for the failure of the prior proceeding. The judgment in State Bank of India vs. Visa Steel Ltd. regarding excluding time spent in prosecuting legal remedies while computing limitation u/s 61(2) was distinguished as inapplicable to the present case. Consequently, the period from 08.06.2023 to 03.01.2024 could not be excluded, resulting in a delay of 209 days, exceeding the condonable period of 15 days. The appeal was dismissed due to the inordinate delay.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Condonation of delay in filing the appeal was denied as the ...

Delay in appeal filing denied; prerequisites unfulfilled. Negligence, not jurisdictional defect. Visa Steel case distinguished. 209 days delay exceeds 15 days limit. Appeal dismissed.

August 10, 2024

Case Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy AT

You may also like:

CENVAT Credit - input - PVC Filler Hollow - credit denied to the assessee on the ground that the supplier of raw material was not liable to pay the duty on the goods...

CENVAT Credit - Rule 5 of the CCR Rules does not stipulate registration of premises as a necessary prerequisite for claiming a refund - credit cannot be denied

The Appellate Tribunal Rules 2016 empower the Registrar to decline registration of an appeal when defects are not cured, and to grant time for curing defects. If defects...

Validity of assessment order pursuant to order u/s 144C - there is no direction given by the ld. DRP to ld. Assessing Officer but the directions were only given to the...

Notice u/s 143(2) issued by a non-jurisdictional Assessing Officer/Deputy Commissioner is invalid and cannot be cured. The assessment order framed u/s 143(3) based on...

Dismissal of an appeal by the appellate authority due to procedural defects, including the failure to submit a Board Resolution appointing the authorized signatory, the...

Validity of Appeal filed by AOP having PAN issued as Individual - CIT(A) did not adjudicate the issue on merits in accordance with the provisions of section 250(6) of...

Interest on refunds u/s 244A - Having availed the time for rectifying the defects and claiming interest for the defect rectification time is unavailable. Such an...

Accrual of income - after defect liability period or contract completion date - if assessee's right to such amount would depend on there being no defects arising in the...

Denial of CENVAT Credit - absence of registration number of service provider - said defect is a rectifiable defect - credit allowed - AT

CENVAT Credit - Input service distributor (ISD) - the defects in ISD invoices are curable defects - stay granted. - AT

Validity of revision u/s 263 regarding eligibility for deduction u/s 80P(2)(d) on interest income from deposits with a cooperative bank was examined. It was held that...

Recovery of erroneous refund - cancellation of eligibility certificate - where the Committee already applied its mind before issuing the certificate and nearly took one...

Supremacy of decision division bench of a non-jurisdictional High Court and a single judge bench of a non-jurisdictional High Court - judicial hierarchy - Applicability...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - notice under section 148 has been issued by a non jurisdictional AO - It is settled principle of law that when the notice under section...

Quick Updates: