Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights August 2024 Year 2024 This

Penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) for disallowing deductions ...


Taxpayer's incorrect claims u/ss 54EC & 54F; Penalty upheld for 54EC, revisit for allowed 54F deduction.

August 27, 2024

Case Laws     Income Tax     AT

Penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) for disallowing deductions u/ss 54EC and 54F. Assessee admitted and withdrew incorrect claim u/s 54EC, constituting furnishing of inaccurate particulars. Penalty upheld for deduction u/s 54EC. Regarding deduction u/s 54F, assessee misrepresented facts during assessment proceedings. Penalty imposed by Assessing Officer and confirmed by Tribunal. However, assessee's claim u/s 54F partially allowed in quantum proceedings. Penalty on allowed portion to be reconsidered. Assessing Officer directed to recompute penalty, granting relief of Rs. 30,00,000/- reducing penalty amount accordingly. Assessee's appeal partly allowed.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Mis-declaration of quantity and value of goods in SEZ unit - penalty u/ss 112(a) and 114A of Customs Act 1962. Option for reduced 25% penalty u/s 114A to be extended if...

  2. This case deals with the levy of penalties u/ss 271AAA and 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act in relation to various additions made to the assessee's income based on seized...

  3. Disallowance of exemption claimed u/s 54EC - non filling ROI - investment made in REC - assessee has neither filed return of income u/s 139(1) of the Act, nor in...

  4. Non-discharge of service tax - extended period invoked, service tax demanded - penalties imposed u/ss 77 and 78 of Finance Act, 1994 - appellant providing taxable...

  5. The assessee was allowed deduction u/s 54/54F without proper examination of relevant details and materials. The Assessing Officer (AO) framed the assessment u/s 143(3)...

  6. The assessee sold agricultural land during the year which the Assessing Officer (AO) treated as a capital asset, leading to levy of long-term capital gains tax. The...

  7. Levy of penalties u/ss 122 and 129 of CGST/SGST Acts - expiry of e-way bill - mens rea in penalty imposition. Technically, violation of law by petitioner in transporting...

  8. Revision u/s 263 - admissibility of deduction u/s 54F - CIT has misinterpreted the provision of law to hold that the assessee was ineligible to claim exemption u/s. 54F...

  9. LTCG - deductions claimed u/s 54 & 54EC - scheduled property acquired through settlement deed executed by the grandfather of the assessee - Since the asset held by the...

  10. Penalty u/s 271(l)(c) - The assessee has immediately on receipt of the notice u/s 142(1) has revised the computation of income restricting the deduction claimed u/s 54F...

  11. Deduction u/s 54, 54F & 54EC - capital gains arising out of a single transaction of sale of immovable property - there is no such bar that both the deductions, u/s 54...

  12. The ITAT Mumbai considered a case involving a penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for concealment of income or furnishing inaccurate particulars of income. The Tribunal found the...

  13. Refund of CGST & SGST wrongly paid - Interpretation of the term “subsequently held” - the term “subsequently held” in section 77 of CGST Act, 2017 or under section 19 of...

  14. Disallowance u/s 80P - claim disallowed u/sec. 143(1)(a)(ii) by way of “processing” as an instance of “incorrect claim if such incorrect claim is there from any...

  15. Deduction claimed u/s 54F OR 54 - Investment of LTCG - Owning more than one house property - CIT(A) deleted the addition considering the same u/s 54 - Assessee revised...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates