This case pertains to the validity of a transfer order u/s 127 ...

Income Tax Transfer Order Challenged, Court Upholds Validity Despite No Prior Hearing.

August 29, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax HC

This case pertains to the validity of a transfer order u/s 127 of the Income Tax Act, where the petitioner's case was transferred from the Commissioner of Income Tax (CIT), Mumbai, to the Central Circle - 20, Range-5, Principal CIT (Central) - 2, New Delhi. The petitioner challenged the transfer order, alleging a breach of the principles of natural justice as no hearing was granted. The High Court dismissed the writ petition, holding that there was sufficient material justifying the transfer, and the petitioner had acquiesced to the transfer order by participating in subsequent proceedings initiated by the Delhi authorities. The court found no grounds to interfere with the impugned order under Article 226 of the Constitution.

View Source

← Previous Next →

This case pertains to the validity of a transfer order u/s 127 ...

Income Tax Transfer Order Challenged, Court Upholds Validity Despite No Prior Hearing.

August 29, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax HC

You may also like:

Penalty levied u/s 274 read with Section 270A - assessee computed tax on disallowed depreciation amount at maximum marginal rate and levied 200% penalty on payable tax -...

Prior period expenditure - when prior period income is taxed prior period expenditure cannot be disallowed - AT

Validity of reopening of assessment u/s 147 - CIRP proceedings - The proceedings under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) cannot be pressed into service to...

The summary highlights the key difference between the scope of total income under the Income Tax Act and the Black Money (Undisclosed Foreign Income and Assets) and...

The Income Tax Act did not intend to tax deemed rental income from properties held as stock-in-trade prior to the assessment year 2018-19. Section 23(5), introduced from...

Interest income on tax refund, though required to be reported under 'income from other sources', was erroneously shown as business income by assessee firm. Despite...

The assessee had been following the mercantile system of accounting, wherein book profits are taken for tax assessment, though credit or debit amounts may not be...

Validity of reopening of assessment - Re-opening notice u/s 148A(d) - personal hearing refused - the High court concluded that Section 148A(b) does not mandate a...

The assessee company is eligible to claim Foreign Tax Credit (FTC) against its Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) liability u/s 115JB of the Income Tax Act for taxes paid in...

Prior period expenses adjustment against the prior period income - once the prior period income is held to be taxable, the prior period expenditure also should be...

Proposed amendment enables recovery of existing liabilities under Black Money (Undisclosed Foreign Income and Assets) and Imposition of Tax Act, 2015 from seized assets...

Taxable income to tax u/s 44BB v/s Section 44DA read with section 9(l)(vii) - The profit from this income was estimated at 25% and offered to tax at 40% plus applicable...

Income tax liability of employees - Remission of income tax liability borne on behalf of the employees - it is also possible that earlier years the assessee has not...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) set aside the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)] under the National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC) and...

Recovery notices and bank attachment orders - No opportunity of being heard - discrepancies between the GSTR 3B return and the GSTR 2B return - The High Court observed...

Quick Updates: