The court held that the impugned order and consequential ...

Tax demand unlawfully recovered without hearing petitioner; order quashed, case remanded for due process compliance.

Case Laws GST

September 2, 2024

The court held that the impugned order and consequential recovery notice were issued in violation of principles of natural justice as the petitioner was not afforded an opportunity to establish their case before the authorities. The tax demand was recovered from the petitioner without due process. Consequently, the court set aside the impugned order and recovery notice. The matter was remitted back to the respondent authority for reconsideration after allowing the petitioner to file a reply and granting a personal hearing. The writ petition was disposed of accordingly.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The court held that the impugned order and consequential ...

Tax demand unlawfully recovered without hearing petitioner; order quashed, case remanded for due process compliance.

Case Laws GST

September 2, 2024

You may also like:

Show cause notice served on petitioner by uploading in GST portal tab without other communication mode; petitioner unaware of proceedings; tax demand confirmed due to...

Breach of principles of natural justice and lack of jurisdiction - Excessive tax demand as a condition for remand - time lag of about two months between the show cause...

Offence u/s 276(C)(2) and 277 - Allegation of willful tax evasion and non-payment of admitted tax - compounding application. The petitioner submitted income tax return...

Service tax demand on Goods Transport Agency (GTA) services rendered on reverse charge basis set aside as appellant did not collect service tax from service recipient....

Recovery of interest u/s 87 without issuance of SCN - in cases where duty has been paid belatedly and interest has not been paid, interest needs to be demanded and...

The Madras High Court found a violation of natural justice as notices were only uploaded on the GST portal without direct communication to the petitioner. The tax...

Principles of natural justice violated due to lack of proper communication regarding show cause notice and order, leading to tax demand confirmation without petitioner's...

The High Court addressed a case involving a violation of natural justice principles due to the petitioner not having a fair opportunity to contest a tax demand. The...

The case pertains to the refund of tax paid by the petitioner under the 'Inverted Duty Structure' in the Goods and Services Tax (GST) regime. The petitioner filed an...

Default u/s 201 - demand notices challenged by the petitioners on the ground that the tax that has been demanded as arrears of tax from the petitioners Tax Deducted at...

Refund amount recovered coercively - Despite paying 20% of the tax in dispute, the tax authorities issued a demand and forcibly recovered the full balance - GST...

Refund of adjustments made in excess of 20% of the disputed tax demands - s per mandate of law as well as the fact that refunds have been adjusted against outstanding...

The court held that the reversal of Input Tax Credit (ITC) by the department due to discrepancy between GSTR 3B and auto-populated GSTR 2A violated principles of natural...

Stay of demand - direction to depositing 40% of the outstanding demand - The court found the stance of requiring a 20% pre-deposition as a precondition for stay...

Service tax liability cannot be imposed twice on the same transaction. The appellant, as a service recipient, was required to pay 75% of the service tax under the...

Quick Updates: