Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights September 2024 Year 2024 This

Notices issued u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act for reassessment ...


Tax notices invalid if faceless procedure ignored.

Case Laws     Income Tax

September 3, 2024

Notices issued u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act for reassessment proceedings related to international tax charges must comply with the mandatory faceless procedure prescribed in the scheme dated 29.03.2022. The exemption from following the faceless procedure u/s 144B and the CBDT order dated 06.09.2021 is limited to passing assessment orders in cases of central charges and international tax charges, and does not extend to issuing notices u/s 148. The plain and unambiguous language of the scheme, Section 144B(2), and the order does not provide for any such exemption for issuing notices u/s 148. The argument distinguishing between NRIs and Indian citizens is rejected, as the requirement for a faceless procedure applies equally. The principle of interpreting taxing statutes based on the natural meaning of the language, as established by judicial precedents, is upheld. Consequently, the notices issued u/s 148 without following the faceless procedure, and all consequential assessment orders based on them, are set aside in favor of the assessee.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Notices issued by Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (JAO) u/s 148 instead of Faceless Assessment Officer (FAO) are invalid after introduction of Finance Act 2021. Scheme...

  2. Notice issued by Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (JAO) instead of Faceless Assessment Officer (FAO) u/s 148A(b) for income escaping assessment is invalid. Faceless...

  3. Faceless assessment notices issued by Joint Assessing Officer (JAO) instead of Faceless Assessment Officer (FAO) held invalid due to non-compliance with Section 151A and...

  4. This case deals with the validity of a notice issued u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act by the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (JAO) in light of the provisions of Section...

  5. Validity of Reopening of assessment - proceedings drawn u/s 148A commenced by the local jurisdictional officer - non adherence to procedure of faceless regime for the...

  6. Validity of Faceless assessment of income escaping assessment u/s 151 - According to Petitioners, the notice could have been issued only by the Faceless Assessing...

  7. Faceless assessment regime mandated u/s 151A - Jurisdictional Assessing Officer not permitted to issue notice u/s 148, as it would breach Section 151A provisions - No...

  8. The High Court examined the jurisdiction of the Assessing Officer (AO) and the prescribed income-tax authority to issue notices u/s 143(2) of the Income Tax Act. It held...

  9. Faceless assessment of income escaping assessment challenged due to non-compliance with Section 151A. Notices issued by Joint Assessing Officer (JAO) instead of Faceless...

  10. Validity of faceless assessment challenged due to non-compliance with Section 151A - notices issued by Joint Assessing Officer (JAO) instead of Faceless Assessing...

  11. Validity of faceless assessment challenged due to notice u/s 148 issued by Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (JAO) instead of Faceless Assessing Officer (FAO), violating...

  12. Validity of issuance of notice under Section 153C - The issuance of the invalid notice dated 14.06.2019 does not compromise the assessment proceedings as, the invalid...

  13. The High Court held that the notice issued by the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (JAO) u/s 148 was invalid as the provisions of Section 151A mandate that such notice...

  14. The court held that the Joint Assessing Officer (JAO) lacked jurisdiction to issue notices u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act for reassessment, as per Section 151A read with...

  15. The court held that the notices issued u/s 133(6) and the subsequent notice u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act were invalid. The petitioner had filed a reply to the notice...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates