Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) for under reporting income - defective ...

Case Laws Income Tax

February 27, 2024

Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) for under reporting income - defective notice - The Tribunal agrees with the appellant's argument, emphasizing that the AO did not apply his mind properly while initiating the penalty proceedings - The Tribunal rules in favor of the appellant, stating that the penalty proceedings were not validly initiated due to the lack of clarity in the penalty charge. - As a result, the penalty is deleted for all assessment years under consideration.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) for under reporting income - defective ...

Case Laws Income Tax

February 27, 2024

You may also like:

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Defective notice u/s 274 - Emphasizing the principles outlined by the Karnataka High Court, the Tribunal reaffirmed the importance of...

The Appellate Tribunal considered two issues: Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) and u/s 270A. For the first, the Tribunal found the penalty notice defective as it did not specify...

The ITAT Mumbai addressed two key issues in the case. Firstly, regarding the penalty u/s 271(1)(c), the tribunal held that the absence of a tick mark on the notice did...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - defective notice u/s 274 - The Tribunal emphasized the necessity for such notices to clearly delineate the charge against the assessee, allowing...

The Assessing Officer (AO) consciously deleted irrelevant portions from the show cause notice, mentioning only the charge of furnishing inaccurate particulars of income....

Levy of penalty u/s.271(1)(c) - defective notice - it would be too technical and pedantic to take the view that because in the printed notice the inapplicable portion...

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - defective notice - non specification of charge - Assessing Officer has issued a vague and defective notice under section 274 r.w.s....

The Appellate Tribunal addressed the issue of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) concerning the correct classification of income. The Assessing Officer treated the income as 'income...

Penalty u/s.271(1)(b) - no compliance to notice u/s 142(1) - The AO levied the penalty for non-compliance of notice dated 13.06.2016, however, there is no reference of...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Defective notice u/s 274 - The notice u/s. 274 r.w.s. 271(l)(c) of the Act were issued without striking off the irrelevant portion of the limb...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Mandation of specification of charge - It is clear that for the AO to assume jurisdiction u/s 271(1)(c), proper notice is necessary and the...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Defective notice - ITAT observed that the notice issued by the AO would be bad in law if it did not specify which limb of Section 271(1) (c) the...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - defective notice - the show cause notice u/s 271(1)(c) AO had neither strike out the inappropriate words nor specify the charges against the...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) - AO has not applied his mind before initiating the penalty proceedings rather borrowed his satisfaction from the “tax...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) - Non-compliance with a notice issued u/s 142(1) - The Tribunal noted that in a previous round of proceedings, a penalty under section 271(1)(b) of...

Quick Updates: