Appellate Tribunal set aside Adjudicating Authority's order ...

Tribunal overturns rejection of defective insolvency petition, mandates notice to rectify defects before dismissal.

September 12, 2024

Case Laws IBC AT

Appellate Tribunal set aside Adjudicating Authority's order rejecting Section 9 application as defective without issuing notice to rectify defects within seven days as mandated by proviso to Section 9(ii). Principles of natural justice violated by not providing opportunity of hearing before rejection. Tribunal relied on precedent holding Adjudicating Authority must allow rectification of defects before rejecting application. Section 9 application revived, appeal disposed of.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Appellate Tribunal set aside Adjudicating Authority's order ...

Tribunal overturns rejection of defective insolvency petition, mandates notice to rectify defects before dismissal.

September 12, 2024

Case Laws IBC AT

You may also like:

Penalty imposed u/s 271AAB - Defective notice - The Tribunal, has verbatim reproduced the penalty notice and we find that the notice is absolutely vague and none of the...

Penalty u/s 271 - Defective notice - the allegation should be specific and clear in the penalty notice also because the assessee has to submit reply in the course of...

The ITAT held that the penalty u/s 271AAB could not be levied due to a defective notice. The AO failed to specify the specific limb for initiating penalty proceedings,...

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Defective notice u/s 274 - Emphasizing the principles outlined by the Karnataka High Court, the Tribunal reaffirmed the importance of...

Rejection of application for rectification of mistake - Applicability of extended period of limitation - Tribunal did not consider the issue sought to rectified - Maybe,...

The Appellate Tribunal considered the validity of a re-assessment notice issued by the jurisdictional AO instead of the designated Faceless Assessing Officer (FAO) as...

The ITAT Mumbai addressed two key issues in the case. Firstly, regarding the penalty u/s 271(1)(c), the tribunal held that the absence of a tick mark on the notice did...

Grant of export incentives under Merchandise Exports from India Scheme (MEIS) - seeking reopening of online portal to allow the petitioner to rectify the inadvertent...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - defective notice u/s 274 - The Tribunal emphasized the necessity for such notices to clearly delineate the charge against the assessee, allowing...

CIRP - Company/ corporate debtor under liquidation - non-receipt of limited notice or receipt of defective limited notice - Personal Guarantor - whether the Demand...

Penalty u/s 271AAB - Defective notice - in the given facts and circumstances of the case wherein the matter written in the body of the notice issued u/s 274 of the Act...

Penalty u/s 271AAB(1)(c) - Defective notice - the matter written in the body of the notice issued u/s 274 of the Act does not refer to the charges of provision of...

ITAT ruled that notice under section 143(2) issued in the name of deceased assessee Smt. S was invalid, despite participation of legal heirs in assessment proceedings....

The Appellate Tribunal considered two issues: Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) and u/s 270A. For the first, the Tribunal found the penalty notice defective as it did not specify...

Rejection of Resolution Plan -Rejection of Resolution Plan -Rejection of Resolution Plan -Rejection of Resolution Plan -Rejection of Resolution Plan -Rejection of...

Quick Updates: