Appellate Tribunal set aside Adjudicating Authority's order ...

Tribunal overturns rejection of defective insolvency petition, mandates notice to rectify defects before dismissal.

Case Laws IBC

September 12, 2024

Appellate Tribunal set aside Adjudicating Authority's order rejecting Section 9 application as defective without issuing notice to rectify defects within seven days as mandated by proviso to Section 9(ii). Principles of natural justice violated by not providing opportunity of hearing before rejection. Tribunal relied on precedent holding Adjudicating Authority must allow rectification of defects before rejecting application. Section 9 application revived, appeal disposed of.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Appellate Tribunal set aside Adjudicating Authority's order ...

Tribunal overturns rejection of defective insolvency petition, mandates notice to rectify defects before dismissal.

Case Laws IBC

September 12, 2024

You may also like:

Penalty imposed u/s 271AAB - Defective notice - The Tribunal, has verbatim reproduced the penalty notice and we find that the notice is absolutely vague and none of the...

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Defective notice u/s 274 - Emphasizing the principles outlined by the Karnataka High Court, the Tribunal reaffirmed the importance of...

Penalty u/s 271 - Defective notice - the allegation should be specific and clear in the penalty notice also because the assessee has to submit reply in the course of...

The Appellate Tribunal considered the validity of a re-assessment notice issued by the jurisdictional AO instead of the designated Faceless Assessing Officer (FAO) as...

The ITAT Mumbai addressed two key issues in the case. Firstly, regarding the penalty u/s 271(1)(c), the tribunal held that the absence of a tick mark on the notice did...

Rejection of application for rectification of mistake - Applicability of extended period of limitation - Tribunal did not consider the issue sought to rectified - Maybe,...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - defective notice u/s 274 - The Tribunal emphasized the necessity for such notices to clearly delineate the charge against the assessee, allowing...

The Appellate Tribunal considered two issues: Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) and u/s 270A. For the first, the Tribunal found the penalty notice defective as it did not specify...

Validity of reassessment proceedings - non-issue of the statutory notice u/s 143(2) - The Appellate Tribunal found that the AO had not issued the statutory notice under...

CIRP - Company/ corporate debtor under liquidation - non-receipt of limited notice or receipt of defective limited notice - Personal Guarantor - whether the Demand...

Penalty u/s 271AAB - Defective notice - in the given facts and circumstances of the case wherein the matter written in the body of the notice issued u/s 274 of the Act...

Penalty u/s 271AAB(1)(c) - Defective notice - the matter written in the body of the notice issued u/s 274 of the Act does not refer to the charges of provision of...

The ITAT Mumbai considered a case involving a penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for concealment of income or furnishing inaccurate particulars of income. The Tribunal found the...

The Appellate Tribunal addressed the rejection of the application for registration u/s 80G(5) due to non-receipt of order by the assessee-trust. The Tribunal noted that...

Grant of export incentives under Merchandise Exports from India Scheme (MEIS) - seeking reopening of online portal to allow the petitioner to rectify the inadvertent...

Quick Updates: