The court found that the factual position was not in dispute. ...

Tax assessment order quashed for lack of due process; matter remanded for fresh hearing.

Case Laws GST

September 12, 2024

The court found that the factual position was not in dispute. The authority made assessments for the financial years 2017-18 and 2018-19 based on an intelligence report. However, for the period from October 2017 to March 2018, the Adjudicating Authority passed an order after providing three opportunities to the petitioner, who did not participate in the proceedings. The petitioner's request letter to the authority to consider the matter cannot be construed as participation. The petitioner should have informed the authority about the overlapping amount, which the authority could have considered. The court held that the order passed by the Adjudicating Authority under Annexure-5 cannot be sustained in law and quashed it. The matter was remitted back to the Adjudicating Authority for rehearing and passing an appropriate order in accordance with law by giving an opportunity of hearing to the parties.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The court found that the factual position was not in dispute. ...

Tax assessment order quashed for lack of due process; matter remanded for fresh hearing.

Case Laws GST

September 12, 2024

You may also like:

The Appellate Tribunal considered the validity of physical/manual filing of appeal u/s the Income Tax Rules. Assessee argued inability to e-file due to lack of...

Determination of tax u/s 73(9) of the CGST/SGST Act - petitioner submits that the order is passed merely on the representation of the petitioner without giving any...

Order quashed due to violation of natural justice principles by not granting proper opportunity for personal hearing. Excess input tax credit availed on inputs subject...

Principles of natural justice violated due to lack of proper communication regarding show cause notice and order, leading to tax demand confirmation without petitioner's...

Recovery notice - Validity of assessment orders - The High court observed that while personal hearings were offered to the petitioner, it was evident that the petitioner...

The petition raised issues regarding the maintainability of the appeal u/s 107 of the UPGST Act, 2017, violation of Section 75(4) of the Act, and denial of opportunity...

Customs duty concession case remanded due to violation of principles of natural justice by not providing relied upon documents. Department denied copies of investigation...

The Appellate Tribunal reviewed an ex parte order by the CIT(A) concerning the addition of unexplained income under sections 69 and 69A, with tax levied under section...

The High Court found that the respondents failed to properly consider the petitioner's contentions regarding the retrospective cancellation of GST registration of its...

The ITAT held that the disallowance of exemption claimed u/s 10(23C)(vi) due to a clerical error in the income tax return was improper. The order u/s 154 by CPC violated...

Validity of order if Initiation of CIRP - After the final hearing of the matter, ITAT reserved the order for passing - Thereafter, appellant prayed for recall the...

The High Court quashed the order of cancellation of registration passed by the respondent authorities without providing an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner,...

The High Court examined the validity of an assessment order issued without offering a personal hearing, deeming it a breach of natural justice. The case was transferred...

Input Tax Credit - commission paid to the foreign agent - High Court has observed some discrepancy in the order of tribunal - The High Court ought to have then remanded...

The case pertains to a violation of the principles of natural justice, wherein the petitioner's right to an opportunity for personal hearing, as provided under the law,...

Quick Updates: