The court found that the factual position was not in dispute. ...

Tax assessment order quashed for lack of due process; matter remanded for fresh hearing.

Case Laws GST

September 12, 2024

The court found that the factual position was not in dispute. The authority made assessments for the financial years 2017-18 and 2018-19 based on an intelligence report. However, for the period from October 2017 to March 2018, the Adjudicating Authority passed an order after providing three opportunities to the petitioner, who did not participate in the proceedings. The petitioner's request letter to the authority to consider the matter cannot be construed as participation. The petitioner should have informed the authority about the overlapping amount, which the authority could have considered. The court held that the order passed by the Adjudicating Authority under Annexure-5 cannot be sustained in law and quashed it. The matter was remitted back to the Adjudicating Authority for rehearing and passing an appropriate order in accordance with law by giving an opportunity of hearing to the parties.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The court found that the factual position was not in dispute. ...

Tax assessment order quashed for lack of due process; matter remanded for fresh hearing.

Case Laws GST

September 12, 2024

You may also like:

Petitioner failed to authorize representative for GST matters after registration under GST regime, resulting in show cause notice being served on auditor without...

The Appellate Tribunal considered the validity of physical/manual filing of appeal u/s the Income Tax Rules. Assessee argued inability to e-file due to lack of...

Determination of tax u/s 73(9) of the CGST/SGST Act - petitioner submits that the order is passed merely on the representation of the petitioner without giving any...

The High Court quashed refund rejection orders for lack of opportunity for personal hearing as mandated by Rule 92(3) of CGST Rules, 2017, violating principles of...

Order quashed due to violation of natural justice principles by not granting proper opportunity for personal hearing. Excess input tax credit availed on inputs subject...

Principles of natural justice violated due to lack of proper communication regarding show cause notice and order, leading to tax demand confirmation without petitioner's...

Recovery notice - Validity of assessment orders - The High court observed that while personal hearings were offered to the petitioner, it was evident that the petitioner...

The court held that the impugned order was passed in violation of principles of natural justice as no opportunity of personal hearing was provided to the petitioner...

Bank attachment order set aside due to lack of opportunity for personal hearing, violating natural justice principles. Order remanded for fresh consideration after...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has adjudicated on various issues concerning deductions u/ss 80IA(4), 14A, and 35D. Regarding Section 80IA(4) deduction, the...

The petition raised issues regarding the maintainability of the appeal u/s 107 of the UPGST Act, 2017, violation of Section 75(4) of the Act, and denial of opportunity...

Customs duty concession case remanded due to violation of principles of natural justice by not providing relied upon documents. Department denied copies of investigation...

Refund of double tax paid by petitioner along with interest for November and December 2020 sought. Non-filing of GSTR-3B from July to December 2020. Petitioner to claim...

The Appellate Tribunal reviewed an ex parte order by the CIT(A) concerning the addition of unexplained income under sections 69 and 69A, with tax levied under section...

The High Court found that the respondents failed to properly consider the petitioner's contentions regarding the retrospective cancellation of GST registration of its...

Quick Updates: