Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
GST - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights September 2024 Year 2024 This

Challenge to show cause notice u/s 74 of Central/Gujarat Goods ...


Court Rules in Favor of Petitioner on GST Classification, Quashes Notices, and Directs Regularization of Past Returns.

September 14, 2024

Case Laws     GST     HC

Challenge to show cause notice u/s 74 of Central/Gujarat Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 regarding classification of product manufactured by petitioner under HSN 19059040 instead of HSN 19059030 and consequent levy of GST. Court held that in view of minutes of GST Council meeting and circular dated 1st August, 2023, issue was to be regularized on 'as is where is' basis up to 22.07.2023, meaning petitioners' claim of exemption under HSN 19059040 and payment of nil GST to continue as filed. Respondents misinterpreted 'as is' basis by issuing impugned notices levying 18% GST under HSN 19059030, ignoring binding advance ruling. When petitioners claimed exemption under HSN 19059040 and paid nil GST, same was required to be regularized 'as is' as per GST Council and Board's notification coupled with binding advance ruling. Impugned show cause notices quashed, respondents directed to regularize past returns filed by petitioners on 'as is' basis accepting nil rate of GST up to 22.07.2023. Petition allowed.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Impugned show cause notice for shortfall in service tax payment based on Rule 5(1) of Service Tax (Determination of Value) Rules, 2006 quashed as ultra vires Section 67...

  2. Validity of SCN proposing to declare the petitioners as wilful defaulters - Classification of Account as NPA - Impact of CIRP proceedings under IBC - The High Court held...

  3. The court held that the notices issued u/s 133(6) and the subsequent notice u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act were invalid. The petitioner had filed a reply to the notice...

  4. The court held that the show cause notice issued by the respondents alleging non-payment of service tax by the petitioner for the financial year 2013-14 was without...

  5. The High Court held that respondent No. 3 cannot avoid deciding the petitioners' application dated 20 December 2023 seeking an advance ruling on the taxability of sale...

  6. The High Court ruled on the constitutional validity of Rule 96(10) of the Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017, which was challenged as being ultra vires...

  7. The High Court dismissed the petition challenging the show-cause notice dated 20.08.2024 issued by the respondent authority in relation to the refund of integrated taxes...

  8. Method of communication of notice - The High Court examined the provisions of Section 282(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and Rule 127(1) of the Income Tax Rules, 1962...

  9. The High Court allowed the petition and quashed the impugned order rejecting the petitioner's refund application for unutilized input tax credit. The court held that the...

  10. The Madras High Court considered the issue of personal hearing notice u/s FEMA 1999. The Court held that Rule 4(3) does not require the reasoned opinion to be...

  11. The Orissa High Court considered a case involving inordinate delay in adjudicating a show cause notice issued in 2008 related to a dispute from 2004-05. The court held...

  12. Maintainability of advance ruling application questioned due to pending classification issue before Customs Officer for 13 imported products used in Lithium-ion cell...

  13. The High Court quashed the impugned show cause notice for service tax demand exceeding Rs. 50,00,000/- due to the department's failure to conduct mandatory pre-notice...

  14. Classification of goods - The petitioner alleges that the show cause notices were issued with a pre-determined notion regarding the classification of goods, thereby...

  15. The High Court quashed the show cause notices and orders issued by the revenue authorities due to inordinate delay ranging from 9 to 20 years in adjudicating the...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates