Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
GST - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights September 2024 Year 2024 This

Seizure order for detention of goods due to absence of State ...


Seizure and Penalty Orders Quashed for Lack of UP E-way Bill; Court Cites Non-enforceability During March 2018.

September 14, 2024

Case Laws     GST     HC

Seizure order for detention of goods due to absence of State E-way Bill was challenged. The Court held that at the time of interception, the Central E-way Bill under GST Act was available, and only the E-way Bill under UP GST Act was not present, which was later produced before passing the penalty order. The issue was covered by previous Division Bench judgments, which held that from 1.2.2018 to 31.3.2018, the requirement of E-way Bill under UP GST Act was not enforceable. Since the goods were detained and seized on 23.3.2018 solely for the absence of the E-way Bill under UP GST Act, and the Central E-way Bill was accompanying the goods, the detention order, seizure order, and penalty were unjustified. Consequently, the impugned orders dated 24.3.2018 and 1.10.2020 were quashed by the High Court, and the petition was allowed.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. The High Court addressed penalty u/s 129(3) of the Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 following premises search. Relying on precedent, the Court held that...

  2. Non-generation of e-way bill during transportation of goods led to seizure order u/s 129(3) of GST Act, imposing penalty and interest. However, it was admitted that...

  3. Simultaneous investigation by the Central and State GST authorities - the period of enquiry as far as Central tax authority is concerned is from July, 2017 to June, 2018...

  4. The High Court addressed the validity of a seizure order u/s 67(2) of the CGST Act, focusing on whether the term "things" includes cash/currency seized during search and...

  5. HC examined procedural compliance in tax assessment proceedings. The court determined that the order dated March 30, 2021 constituted a draft assessment order rather...

  6. Validity of Seizure Order u/s 129 (1) - goods not accompanied with E-way bill - Admittedly, till 31st March, 2018 it was not mandatory to download the E-way bill from...

  7. Permission to rectify the GST Return filed for the period September, 2017 and March 2018 in Form-B2B instead of B2C as was wrongly filed under GSTR-1 in order to get the...

  8. Criminal complaint filed u/s 200 of Cr.P.C. for the offence punishable u/s 276C(2) read with Section 278B of the Income Tax Act. Petitioners failed to deposit assessed...

  9. Transitional credit of CENVAT credit - On 4th January, 2018, when the Petitioner attempted to load TRAN-2 Form, no time had been specified under the Rules, which could...

  10. The petitioner challenged the order imposing tax liability and penalty for wrongful availment of CENVAT credit, alleging violation of principles of natural justice and...

  11. The High Court quashed the seizure order dated 14.08.2020, holding that it violated Sections 7, 11, 46 and 47 of the Customs Act, 1962 and Section 3(2) of the Foreign...

  12. The High Court quashed penalty u/s E-Way Bill violation, classifying goods as ODC due to speed without intent to evade tax. Relying on precedent, mens rea is essential...

  13. Rejection of refunds - Export of services - Proof of date of providing / exporting services - during the month of December 2017, the Invoices/Debit Notes were missed to...

  14. Impugned order quashing levy of penalty for transportation of goods upheld. Power of detention or seizure can only be exercised when goods lack genuine documents under...

  15. Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions (Removal of Difficulties) Second Order, 2018

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates