Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
FEMA - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights September 2024 Year 2024 This

Appellant was found guilty of contravening Sections 8(3) read ...


Over-invoicing book imports and illegal forex remittances lead to FERA penalty.

Case Laws     FEMA

September 14, 2024

Appellant was found guilty of contravening Sections 8(3) read with 8(4) and Sections 8(3) read with 8(4) read with Section 64 of FERA for over-invoicing imported books and unauthorised foreign exchange remittances through proprietorship firms. Although not the mastermind, Appellant had knowledge of the fraudulent scheme and allowed the main accused to use proprietorship names for imports. Based on recorded statements and available records, Appellate Tribunal established Appellant's involvement in the contravention. The penalty was reduced to Rs. 2 Lakhs, which was already pre-deposited. The blocked amount of Rs. 60,859.52 in Appellant's firm's account was directed to be released along with interest.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Appellate Tribunal set aside penalties imposed on licensed money exchanger for alleged illegal export of currency and import of gold. Observed no evidence of illegal...

  2. Levy of penalty u/s 112 & 114 of the Customs Act, 1962 - allegation of abating the importer - In present import, there is no evidence to allege that appellants were...

  3. The Appellate Tribunal found the Appellant in contravention of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act (FERA) for instructing Indian Banks to credit accounts of...

  4. The case involved the determination of penalty u/s 69(1)(k) of the J&K Value Added Tax Act, 2005 for the issuance of 35 improper invoices on the same day. The High Court...

  5. Penalty for false invoice - Section 55(2) AP VAT Act states that any VAT dealer, who issues a false tax invoice or receives and uses a tax invoice, knowing it to be...

  6. The ITAT, an Appellate Tribunal, addressed the issue of penalty u/s 271B for failure to maintain and audit books of accounts under section 44AB. The assessee did not...

  7. Imposition of penalty u/s 112(a) of Customs Act, 1962 - import of LED battern fixture, LED panel light, LED flood light etc. - prohibited goods or not - the BIS number...

  8. The case involves the validity of documents from Income Tax Department as evidence in FERA proceedings. The court held that documents from other law proceedings can be...

  9. Exemption from duty of customs - import of Lithium Ion Cell (Captive Consumption - For LED) - Emergency LED Light is fundamentally a type of LED light, albeit a...

  10. Imposition of Penalties u/s 112(a) & (b) and 114AA - Each appellant denied direct involvement or knowledge of the illegal activities, claiming to have played different...

  11. The assessee was levied penalty u/s 271B for delay in filing the audit report u/s 44AB within the stipulated time. The assessee contended that the invoices and other...

  12. FERA 1973 - Release of foreign exchange in violation of the instructions of the RBI resulting in a violation of the relevant provisions of the FERA 1973 - Imposition of...

  13. Penalty u/s 271A and u/s 271B - not maintaining books of account and for not getting the booking of account audited as provided u/s 44AB - Penalties levied u/s 271A for...

  14. The Appellate Tribunal found the Appellant Company guilty of contravening u/s 9(1)(a) of FERA 1973 by making payments to a person outside India without RBI permission....

  15. Levy of penalty on the Director of the Company - Valuation of imported goods - import of luxury vehicles by misusing the Transfer of Residence (TR) Scheme - The Tribunal...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates