The petitioner challenged the assessment order solely on the ...

Taxpayer loses case for challenging tax assessment without exhausting statutory appeal remedies.

Case Laws GST

September 21, 2024

The petitioner challenged the assessment order solely on the ground of not availing the statutory remedy of appeal. The court held that the petitioner did not file an appeal and allowed the assessment order to become final, subsequently approaching the court through a writ petition to challenge the tax, interest, and penalty determination. The petitioner was given an opportunity for a hearing, and the impugned order was passed thereafter. No plausible explanation was provided for not resorting to the statutory appeal remedy. The petitioner consciously chose not to file an appeal u/s 107 of the RGST/CGST Act, 2017, allowing the limitation period and the maximum condonable delay period to expire. Having not preferred an appeal, the writ petition was dismissed as not maintainable.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The petitioner challenged the assessment order solely on the ...

Taxpayer loses case for challenging tax assessment without exhausting statutory appeal remedies.

Case Laws GST

September 21, 2024

You may also like:

The case involves a challenge to a refund claim for service tax u/s unjust enrichment principles. CESTAT held that refund can only be granted based on the assessment...

This case involves a challenge to an order of re-assessment under the relevant tax laws. The key points are: The petitioner failed to submit monthly returns within the...

Entitlement of Refund without challenging the order of assessment which has attained finality - it is evident that a person is not entitled to claim refund of duty...

Refund of service tax - Unjust enrichment - Period of limitation - Tax paid on self assessment basis - Claim of refund without challenging the assessment, to claim the...

Demand of additional tax on simple processing of income - Applicability of provision of Section 143(1A) where assessment may have been completed u/s 143(3) - The High...

Non-granting interest u/s 244A on excess self-assessment tax from January 2017 to October 2017 was denied, citing the refund was less than 10% of the tax determined in...

The High Court reviewed an assessment order challenged for being unreasoned. The Court found that the order lacked proper reasoning as it confirmed the tax proposal...

The taxpayer filed an original return which was processed by the CPC. Subsequently, a revised return was filed u/s 139(5) with a self-assessment tax of Rs. 10,820/-....

The case involved a challenge to the validity of approval u/s 153D for assessment u/s 153A. The Appellate Tribunal found that the approval granted by the JCIT was...

Validity of assessment u/s 153A - Non issuance of notice U/s 143(2) - Protective assessment - the assessment has been made on a protective basis, but, it is not clear...

The taxpayer, an IT/support services provider, received reimbursements from its associated enterprises (AEs) for the cost of providing such services. The tax authorities...

Tax authority rejected rectification application filed by taxpayer for zero-rated supply citing violation of principles of natural justice. Court examined impugned...

Challenge to the recovery notices without challenging the order-in-original - service tax was collected but not paid - the petitioner cannot challenge the consequential order - HC

The Assessing Officer (AO) reopened the assessment solely based on the information from a survey conducted by the Sales Tax Department, without independently examining...

For payment of tax, no assessment order is required and only in case of short payment of tax assessment is required after due notice - but for the deferral in payment of...

Quick Updates: