The amended petition filed by the Respondent amounted to a fresh ...

Company feud turns ugly: Rival faction's sneaky petition maneuver backfires due to lack of fair hearing.

Case Laws Companies Law

September 27, 2024

The amended petition filed by the Respondent amounted to a fresh petition under the guise of an amendment, as it involved a complete redraft of the original petition with additional grounds and reliefs. The amendments were substantial, including the addition of new reliefs, impleading a new party, and introducing additional acts of oppression. As per the Aurosagar Estates case, such substantial amendments require a formal application, granting the opposing party an opportunity to rebut the proposed changes. However, the impugned order did not adhere to the principles of natural justice by allowing the amended petition without providing the Appellant an opportunity to be heard. Consequently, the appeal was disposed of.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The amended petition filed by the Respondent amounted to a fresh ...

Company feud turns ugly: Rival faction's sneaky petition maneuver backfires due to lack of fair hearing.

Case Laws Companies Law

September 27, 2024

You may also like:

Validity of Revision u/s 263 - The order passed by the PCIT suffers from lack of due opportunity of hearing as the PCIT while making such observation that the lender...

Opportunity to be heard to ICA Lenders not provided - ‘person concerned’ - the NCLT has denied an opportunity to be heard to ICA Lenders on the ground that insofar as...

Validity of reopening of assessment - Re-opening notice u/s 148A(d) - personal hearing refused - the High court concluded that Section 148A(b) does not mandate a...

The Appellate Tribunal reviewed an ex parte order by the CIT(A) concerning the addition of unexplained income under sections 69 and 69A, with tax levied under section...

Seeking winding up of respondent company - Failure to pay outstanding dues - section 434 of the Companies Act, 1956 - The court noted the substantial unpaid amount...

TDS u/s 194A - TDS on deemed dividend - loan advanced by the assessee company to the other group companies - Even if, the appellant company hold 100% shares in these...

“Vanishing companies” can only be listed companies; so far 161 “vanishing companies” have been traced

The High Court examined the validity of an assessment order issued without offering a personal hearing, deeming it a breach of natural justice. The case was transferred...

Investigation into the affairs of the appellant company - The matter is only at the stage of investigation and otherwise also the appellant company has not been able to...

The Allahabad High Court addressed the denial of a personal hearing in a tax assessment case, emphasizing the mandatory nature of such hearings u/s 75(4) of the U.P. GST...

Dishonor of Cheque - insufficiency of funds - existence of company after merger - When under a judicial order, merger of the Companies has taken place, the earlier...

Company liquidation proceedings warrant termination due to complete winding up, lack of funds, or other reasons preventing continuation. Court dissolved company,...

Petitioner failed to authorize representative for GST matters after registration under GST regime, resulting in show cause notice being served on auditor without...

Hearing of the appeal out of turn - grievance of very high-pitched scrutiny assessment - petitioner did not comply with notice u/s 142(1) - In writ jurisdiction, we are...

The Appellate Tribunal addressed the rejection of the application for registration u/s 80G(5) due to non-receipt of order by the assessee-trust. The Tribunal noted that...

Quick Updates: