The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that the Assessing ...

Tax Tribunal Orders Reinstatement of TDS Credit After Assessing Officer's Error in Rectification Process.

September 27, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax AT

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that the Assessing Officer (AO) erred in denying the assessee's request for rectification u/s 154 of the Income Tax Act and allowing credit for the difference in Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) for the assessment year 2019-20. The AO had initially restricted TDS based on Rule 37BA but later rectified the mistake u/s 154, allowing credit for the difference. However, the AO subsequently issued a letter denying the rectification without giving the assessee an opportunity of being heard, which is a mandatory requirement u/s 154(3). The ITAT set aside the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and directed the AO to give effect to the earlier rectification order allowing credit for the difference in TDS.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that the Assessing ...

Tax Tribunal Orders Reinstatement of TDS Credit After Assessing Officer's Error in Rectification Process.

September 27, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

Credit of TDS can be granted only when income corresponding to such TDS is assessed to tax in the same financial year. Assessee has the liberty to approach the Assessing...

Revenue authorities cannot restrict tax deducted at source (TDS) credit based on assessee's original income tax return. When refund arises from appellate order,...

The Appellate Tribunal addressed two issues regarding TDS credit. Firstly, the Tribunal emphasized that income and TDS must align in any assessment year when income is...

Disallowance of TDS on account of mismatch & later on TDS matched but AO not given credit - Although the rectification application was filed beyond the permissible time...

Tax deducted at source (TDS) credit was denied in the intimation u/s 143(1) to the assessee. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) upheld the Centralized Processing...

Tax Credit Entitlement - Credit of TDS if deductor failed to deposit the TDS to the Government

The Tribunal held that the assessment order passed by the Assessing Officer was barred by limitation and quashed it. As per Section 144C(13) read with Section 143(3),...

Transitioning unutilized input tax credit under the Kerala Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 - error in claiming input tax credit of unadjusted TDS. The High Court held...

Validity of assessment order - Since, the levy of tax under the Act on the sale of goods during the course of import was an error apparent on the face of the record, the...

The assessee failed to claim the Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) credit in the original income tax return and did not file a revised return. The Assessing Officer (AO) did...

Determining the jurisdiction of appellate forum - jurisdiction of this Tribunal - The Tribunal refers to the legal precedent established in a Supreme Court case...

Refund of excess tax paid - The Assessing Officer committed a serious error in providing for adjustment of the excess tax against the demands for the later years. - The...

AO has passed the impugned order under section 220(2) without giving effect to the order of the CIT(A). It appears that the Assessing Officer has deliberately not passed...

TDS u/s 194H - non deduction of TDS commission paid to Primary Agriculture Co-operative Society (PACS) The Tribunal analyzed guidelines issued by the State Government...

The ITAT held that where the assessee entered into a unilateral Advance Pricing Agreement (APA) with the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) and complied with its...

Quick Updates: