Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights September 2024 Year 2024 This

Addition u/s 68 - Bogus share capital and share premium received. ...


Bogus share capital infusion with unexplained premium rejected as assessee failed to prove credibility.

Case Laws     Income Tax

September 27, 2024

Addition u/s 68 - Bogus share capital and share premium received. The assessee failed to prove the identity and creditworthiness of the subscriber companies and the genuineness of the transactions. The assessee could not justify the huge premium charged nor establish the creditworthiness of the share applicants/shareholders. Most applicants lacked regular income sources or strong financials to justify the investment with huge premium. The assessee did not carry out any valuation to justify the premium charged. The transactions relating to share issuance were not genuine, and the creditworthiness of the creditors was not established. Based on judicial precedents and the CIT(A)'s findings that the applicants were shell companies, the ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s order treating the addition u/s 68 as valid.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Addition u/s 68 - share capital issued at the premium - unexplained cash credit - Assessee has fully discharged its onus cast under section 68 of the Act and proved the...

  2. Unexplained cash credits u/s 68 were added due to assessee's failure to discharge onus regarding bogus share capital including premium receipts. Despite filing...

  3. Addition u/s 68 - unexplained cash credits of share capital and security premium - assessee has no plausible explanation to explain the source of alleged sum of share...

  4. Addition u/s 68 - unexplained cash credits of share capital and security premium received - the assessee has routed its unaccounted income in the books of account in the...

  5. Addition u/s 68 - unexplained share premium and share capital - the assessee has substantially provided materials to prove the genuineness of the share holders apart...

  6. Unexplained share capital and share premium - Not only the assessee has proved the identity and creditworthiness of the investors and genuineness of the transactions by...

  7. Non-proving identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of share premium received cannot be treated as unexplained income if sufficient documentary evidence is provided....

  8. The assessee received share application money and premium from a company that admitted to providing accommodation entries. The AO rejected the assessee's claim, citing...

  9. Unexplained share capital/share premium - proof of genuine investors - the assessee has been able to prove identity of the share applicants, their creditworthiness and...

  10. Unexplained cash credit u/s 68 - Bogus share capital and share premium - Since, the present assessment year is 2008-09, there is no onus on the assessee to prove the...

  11. Addition u/s 68 - unexplained cash credit received - onus to prove - share capital/premium received by the appellant - The Tribunal (ITAT) found that the assessee failed...

  12. Addition u/s 68 - bogus share capital & share premium - The assessee failed to prove that the transactions of share application money is genuine and the creditworthiness...

  13. Unexplained share capital and premium received by assessee company was its own unaccounted money flowing back in form of premium on share allotment. Assessee filed...

  14. Disallowance of interest on interest-free loans was rejected as the assessee had utilized meager amounts from surplus funds for non-business purposes. Regarding bogus...

  15. The assessee, a professional stock broker, claimed loss on trading of shares which was disallowed by the Assessing Officer (AO) on the grounds that the trades were not...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates