Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Central Excise - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights October 2024 Year 2024 This

This case deals with the extinguishment of demands due to the ...


Ruchi Soya Saga: Revenue's Claim Extinguished Due to Non-Filing During CIRP.

Case Laws     Central Excise

October 5, 2024

This case deals with the extinguishment of demands due to the non-filing of claims by the revenue during the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC). The key points are: 1) Ruchi Soya underwent CIRP, and Patanjali continued its business after the resolution plan was approved. 2) The revenue did not file any claim before the Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) during CIRP. 3) As the demand was not part of the resolution plan, it stood extinguished and cannot be continued per Section 31 and 32A of the IBC. 4) The Gujarat High Court held that if the revenue does not lodge a claim as an Operational Creditor before the Resolution Professional, any liability extinguishes upon the implementation of the Resolution Plan. 5) The resolution plan aims to continue the company's business as a going concern under the IBC's scheme. 6) Rule 22 of the 1982 Rules, which deals with abatement, is not applicable when a resolution plan is approved under the IBC. 7) The substantial question of law was answered in favor of the assessee against the revenue.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. The case pertains to the extinguishment of claims under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) against Ruchi Soya Industries Limited, after the acceptance of the...

  2. Successful Resolution Applicant paid pre-CIRP electricity dues under protest to Respondent for restoring Corporate Debtor's electricity connection to revive operations...

  3. The Appellant sought payment of its pre-CIRP dues from the Respondent in a manner different from the approved resolution plan, which provided for payment of pre-CIRP...

  4. CIRP - extinguished claims - When CIRP has been terminated way back in 2017 and the Corporate Debtor is already in saddle after following the due process, allowing a...

  5. The ITAT Delhi held that denial of Foreign Tax Credit (FTC) claim due to late filing of Form 67 after the due date of filing Income Tax Return (ITR) was not justified....

  6. Liquidation of company - It must be borne in mind that the IBC treats the CIRP and Liquidation process as two separate stages and the proof of claim is to be filed...

  7. Once a resolution plan is approved u/s 31(1) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC), only the debts specified in the resolution plan remain payable. This...

  8. CIRP - Recovery of electricity dues - Liability of successful Auction Purchaser in the liquidation proceeding of the Corporate Debtor - The submission of the Appellant...

  9. Non-payment of arrears dues of GST for the period prior to commencement of CIRP - net GST liability from the date of commencement of CIRP - Revenue directed to allow the...

  10. Rejection of the simultaneous claim by the Resolution Professional of the Corporate Debtor - Claim filed by the Applicant with respect to the corporate guarantee given...

  11. The High Court held that once a resolution plan is approved u/s 31(1) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC), only the debts specified in the resolution plan...

  12. GST registration cancellation due to non-filing of returns and non-payment of taxes. Considering the company underwent CIRP process under Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code,...

  13. The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal, holding that the appellant's claim for outstanding income tax demands against the corporate debtor could not be admitted...

  14. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal considered whether an assessee can claim deduction under Chapter VI-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the first time in the return...

  15. The appellant's claim for Rs. 9.21 crores, arising from the termination of an agreement due to non-renewal of a performance bank guarantee, was not considered by the...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates