Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Central Excise - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights October 2024 Year 2024 This

The CESTAT held that in the absence of Section 3A of the Central ...


CESTAT Rules Compounded Levy Scheme Orders Invalid Post-2001 Due to Lack of Statutory Power; Appeal Allowed.

October 5, 2024

Case Laws     Central Excise     AT

The CESTAT held that in the absence of Section 3A of the Central Excise Act, 1944, and Rules 96ZO, ZP, and ZQ of the Central Excise Rules, 1944, along with any saving clause, the adjudicating authority lacked statutory power to decide matters related to the compounded levy scheme after March 1, 2001. Consequently, the orders-in-original passed by the adjudicating authority, holding the appellants liable to pay duty under the compounded levy scheme, were non-est and lacked legal authority. The entire proceedings, including the show cause notices and adjudication thereof, were vitiated. Without a valid provision or saving clause, the adjudication proceedings were illegal and incorrect, and no demand could be confirmed. Therefore, the impugned orders were unsustainable, and the appeal was allowed.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Offence under FEMA - Levy of penalty post compounding orders - We cannot hold petitioners responsible for contravention once the compounding orders have been passed. We...

  2. The CESTAT, an Appellate Tribunal, addressed the issue of continuing an appeal post the NCLT's approval of the resolution plan. Referring to Rule 22 of CESTAT...

  3. The case involves an appeal before CESTAT regarding continuation post Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) under IBC, 2016. NCLT approved a Resolution Plan...

  4. The High Court considered an application for compounding contravention under FEMA. The petitioner filed Form FC-TRS belatedly, leading to investigations and complaints....

  5. Refund of duty - doctrine of unjust enrichment - duty was paid under compounded levy scheme - the principle of the unjust enrichment, which is ordinarily applicable only...

  6. The CESTAT dismissed an appeal for non-prosecution under Rule 20 of CESTAT Procedure Rules, 1982, after multiple adjournments exceeded the statutory maximum of three....

  7. Opting out of scheme of compound levy / composite method of taxation on ground of closure of business - scheme once opted can be withdrawn only within the framework of...

  8. CESTAT (Appellate Tribunal) addressed whether appeals continue post initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) and approval of Resolution plan u/s...

  9. The High Court held that the Central Board of Direct Tax's Compounding Guidelines dated 16 September 2022, which rejected the application for compounding u/s 279(2) on...

  10. Recovery of Excise Duty - Compounded Levy Scheme - When the petitioner admits that he was paying the excise duty under the Compounded Levy Scheme and he is bound by the...

  11. HC upheld validity of Rule 36(4) of CGST Rules, dismissing constitutional challenge. Court determined Rule 36(4) derives authority from Section 16 of CGST Act and...

  12. Settlement Commission lacks power to rectify order u/s 245F(1) by levying interest u/ss 234A, 234B, and 234C prior to 01.06.2011. Rectification order on 21.03.2003 was...

  13. GST rates for Composition Scheme with CGST Rules, 2017 aligned between notification and rules.

  14. Central excise retrun - Duty payment has been made under Rule 3A of the Act and not under Section 3 - Under compounded levy scheme, this is the statutory return which is...

  15. HC determined the show-cause notice and Order-in-Original under Finance Act, 1994 were invalid due to improper service procedures under Section 37C of Central Excise...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates