The summary focuses on the interpretation and applicability of ...

Incorrect interpretation of tax laws led to wrongful penalty on cash receipts from property sale.

October 8, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax AT

The summary focuses on the interpretation and applicability of Section 271D and Section 269SS of the Income Tax Act. The key points are: Section 271D imposes a penalty for violating the provisions of Section 269SS, which prohibits receiving a sum exceeding Rs. 20,000 as a loan or deposit from any person. However, Section 269SS does not cover the receipt of cash consideration for the sale of immovable property. The authorities erroneously interpreted Section 269SS and imposed a penalty u/s 271D for receiving cash consideration from the sale of immovable properties. The Appellate Tribunal held that the Assessing Officer committed an error in invoking Sections 269SS and 271D in this case and quashed the penalty imposed.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The summary focuses on the interpretation and applicability of ...

Incorrect interpretation of tax laws led to wrongful penalty on cash receipts from property sale.

October 8, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

Penalty levied u/s 271D for contravention of Section 269SS, which restricts cash transactions above a specified sum for immovable property. The key points are: The...

Cash credit u/s 68 r.w.s. 115BBE - cash deposit during demonetization period - assessee's failure to maintain books of accounts u/s 44AD. Held that where exemption from...

Recovery of sales tax dues - encumbered property or not - liability of auction purchasers - this is a clear case in which the Sales Tax Department had a charge on the...

Recovery of tax dues - Right of auction purchaser of the property - Since the petitioner had purchased in the auction sale conducted by the bank under the provisions of...

Unexplained cash deposits in bank account were found genuine based on evidence of sale of land agreement, disclosure in audited books, and statements from involved...

The ITAT Visakhapatnam dealt with a case involving penalty u/s. 271D for receiving cash in relation to the transfer of immovable property, which falls under section...

Penalty u/s. 271D - Receipt of cash against sale of immovable property - The sale transaction is duly evidenced by the registered agreement / deed. Considering the fact...

Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(C) - exemption u/s 80-IC - income in the garb of fictitious cash sales - Assessing Officer as well as the Appellate Authority, rightly gave...

The assessee's unexplained cash credits u/s 68 were deleted by the CIT(A) after accepting the submissions that the cash receipts from various sources like cash sales,...

Levy of penalty Notice u/s 274 r.w.s. 271D - Cash sale of immovable property - The objective of the amendment proposed in 269SS of the Act is to curb generation of black...

Assessee received cash consideration from sale of property, deposited in bank account and utilized to purchase another property. AO accepted transaction in regular...

Addition u/s 69A - Source of Cash deposit - Assessee contended that same is received in advance against the sale of property - Levy of penalty u/s 271D - The ITAT held...

Settlement Commission's order rejecting exemption u/s 54 on cash portion invested in purchasing property after sale of another property was invalid. Section 54 does not...

Unexplained cash credit under section 68 - if we deny the claim of the assessee for having received the money from the society, it would lead to the double addition of...

Sections 132B, 140A, 153A and 234B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 were analyzed regarding adjustment of seized cash against tax liability. The appellants claimed that cash...

Quick Updates: