Challenge to summons jurisdiction - parallel proceedings - ...

Summons jurisdiction challenged - parallel proceedings on Central GST Act.

Case Laws GST

October 8, 2024

Challenge to summons jurisdiction - parallel proceedings - Central Authorities' jurisdiction u/s 6(2) Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017. Petitioner has no objection to investigation regarding M/s IESA Sales Pvt. Ltd. Held: Respondent No.3 can investigate pursuant to summons dated 21.06.2024 and 05.07.2024 regarding M/s IESA Sales Pvt. Ltd. However, based on communication dated 09.08.2024, Respondent No.3 cannot further investigate Petitioner's transactions with M/s Ridhi Industries and M/s Amazonite Steels Private Ltd. for the relevant period. Petition disposed.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Challenge to summons jurisdiction - parallel proceedings - ...

Summons jurisdiction challenged - parallel proceedings on Central GST Act.

Case Laws GST

October 8, 2024

You may also like:

Parallel proceedings - Validity of summons issued - Summons challenged on the ground that both the Central and State Authorities do not have powers to initiate...

Proper officer - Jurisdiction of Initiate investigation proceedings by the Central GST and State GST authorities simultaneously - cross-empowerment - The Court found...

Jurisdiction - proper officer to issue summons and conduct inquiry - Investigation / Enquiry proceedings initiation by different authorities of state and central GST -...

The High Court considered the validity of a notice issued u/s 65 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 regarding GST Audit. The writ petition challenged the...

Rejection of appellants’ challenge to Summons, summoning the appellants to appear before the Second respondent - The Court found that the second respondent had...

Prosecution, u/s 132(1)(c) of the Central Act - parallel proceedings u/s 74 - There is no principle in law as may warrant any interference in the present petition to...

Jurisdiction to issue summons - Mere pendency of proceedings before the State authorities is not a ground to restrain the Central authorities from issuing summons and...

The court held that Section 6(2)(b) of the Act treats the empowered officers under the SGST/UGST Act at the central level to be at par and does not prescribe for...

Jurisdiction to issue SCN - validity of appointment of officers of DGCEI as ‘Central Excise Officers’ having all India jurisdiction - Though the summons emanate from the...

Validity of Parallel proceedings under GST - the device of transferring investigations or proceedings inter se proper officers to ensure that a taxpayer is not subjected...

The High Court addressed the issue of violation of Right to Privacy and Human Rights in the context of guidelines for issuing summons. It emphasized the need for...

Challenge of jurisdiction u/s.120(4)(b) - If challenge to the jurisdiction has not been made within the prescribed time u/s.124(3) to the authority, whose jurisdiction...

Territorial Jurisdiction - proper officer or not - Registration was assigned to Central GST Officer - SCN was issued by the State GST officer - the distribution of work...

Petitioner challenged recovery of differential Central Excise Duty by enhancing assessable value for bought-out items directly supplied to customers. Respondents failed...

The High Court held that once a proper officer initiates proceedings on a subject matter under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (CGST Act) or the Haryana...

Quick Updates: