Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights October 2024 Year 2024 This

The Appellate Tribunal concurred with the Mumbai Tribunal's ...


Income Tax Dispute: Tribunal Upholds Assessee's Case on Merits.

October 17, 2024

Case Laws     Income Tax     AT

The Appellate Tribunal concurred with the Mumbai Tribunal's order in M/s Pooja Marketing, which comprehensively dealt with all aspects, facts, and applicable case laws. The bench not only considered the validity of revisionary jurisdiction u/s 263 but also decided the issue on merits in favor of the assessee. The case law in CIT vs. Dr. M.A.M. Ramaswamy was distinguished by the learned Senior Counsel in written submissions, which was deliberated upon and found concurrence. No distinguishing feature or reversal of the Mumbai Tribunal's decision by higher judicial authorities was shown. The Tribunal dismissed the revenue's appeal after elaborately dealing with the issue on merits.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Advance tax payment obligation does not apply when assessee claims agricultural land sale proceeds are exempt u/s 2(14). CIT(Appeals) should admit appeal for...

  2. The ITAT held that where the assessee entered into a unilateral Advance Pricing Agreement (APA) with the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) and complied with its...

  3. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal held that an appeal cannot be dismissed solely on the ground of non-filing of return or non-payment of advance tax when the entire...

  4. Income assessed in hands of Appellant as Representative Assessee. No credit for prepaid taxes availed by beneficiaries. JCIT(A) directed AO to verify claim of prepaid...

  5. Penalty levied u/s 274 read with Section 270A - assessee computed tax on disallowed depreciation amount at maximum marginal rate and levied 200% penalty on payable tax -...

  6. The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal u/s 249(4)(b) due to non-payment of advance tax. The assessee did not respond to the notice u/s 142(1) to clarify tax payment....

  7. The Appellate Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)]'s exercise of suo moto power u/s 154 to rectify their earlier order. The CIT(A) had not...

  8. Taxability of income in India - Income attributable to India - income of advertisement and subscription revenue - Permanent Establishment (PE) - business connection -...

  9. The assessee, a foreign company, earned network transportation fees from its Indian associated enterprise (AE), Damco India Private Limited (DIPL). The Assessing Officer...

  10. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by the Revenue Department against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals). The Tribunal upheld...

  11. New scheme for Tax on income of individuals and Hindu undivided family u/s 115BAC - Assessee had not filed Form 10-IE for opting the new tax regime within the stipulated...

  12. The assessee, a company engaged in development/construction and sale of flats and plots, had classified its properties into four categories: flats open for sale, let-out...

  13. The Appellate Tribunal upheld the reopening of assessment u/s 147 due to the assessee providing bogus accommodation loss entries. The AO had reasons to believe in the...

  14. The assessee failed to file income tax returns and produce books of accounts. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) passed a detailed order computing income after...

  15. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal held that the receipt from supply planning services was not taxable as fees for technical services or royalty under the India-United...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates