Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
GST - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights November 2024 Year 2024 This

The High Court addressed the validity of a show cause notice ...


Validity of notices against non-existent entities post-amalgamation under CGST Act.

November 29, 2024

Case Laws     GST     HC

The High Court addressed the validity of a show cause notice (SCN) and final order issued against a non-existent entity, the rectification of procedural defects, and the applicability of Sections 160 and 87 of the CGST Act, 2017, concerning amalgamated companies. Section 87 seeks to preserve and identify transactions between companies that ultimately amalgamate, fixing liabilities under the CGST Act. However, it cannot enable issuing notices or orders against a non-existent entity, as the liabilities would transpose to the amalgamated entity. Consequently, the impugned SCN and order were quashed, and the petition was allowed.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Validity of reopening of assessment - notice against non existent entity / amalgamated company - Notices issued.

  2. Reopening of assessment post amalgamation process - Mere activation of PAN number may not give a right to the revenue to issue notice to a non-existent entity....

  3. The High Court held that the reopening notice issued u/s 148 against a non-existent entity, i.e., the amalgamating company that had ceased to exist due to an approved...

  4. Reassessment proceedings against non existent entity - amalgamated company - Mere activation of PAN number may not give a right to the respondents to issue notice to a...

  5. Validity of assessment against non existent company - amalgamation proceedings concluded - the assessment order passed on a non-existent Company is bad in law, inasmuch...

  6. Reopening of assessment u/s 147 against non-existing entity - scheme of the amalgamation and arrangement approved - The High Court acknowledges the petitioner's argument...

  7. The High Court quashed the reassessment proceedings initiated against the non-existent amalgamating company. Relying on the Supreme Court's decision in Maruti Suzuki...

  8. Reassessment proceedings issued in the name of a non-existent entity - amalgamation of a company - The stand of the revenue that the reassessment was justified in view...

  9. Notice u/s 148 issued to a non-existent entity due to merger. ITAT held such notice illegal, invalid and non-est as per Bombay HC in Uber India Systems Pvt. Ltd. Despite...

  10. Notices/endorsement in Form GST DRC-01 issued to a non-existent entity set aside. Proceedings initiated through show cause notices/endorsement quashed. Respondents at...

  11. Validity of Order passed against a non-existent entity - The Appellate Tribunal's decision revolves around the critical legal principle that an assessment order issued...

  12. The High Court held that initiating tax assessment u/s CGST Act against a dissolved company is a jurisdictional defect, not a procedural one. Once a company is dissolved...

  13. The revenue authorities were aware of the amalgamation of AOK In-house Factoring Services Private Limited with 3i Infotech BPO Limited. The assessing officer passed the...

  14. Respondent M/s Vedanta Limited [Vedanta] is the resultant entity after M/s Cairn India Limited [Cairn] amalgamated with it. The TPO and AO inadvertently made the draft...

  15. HC held assessment orders passed in name of amalgamating companies void ab initio, despite participation of amalgamated company (RIL) in proceedings. Revenue authorities...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates