Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Indian Laws - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights November 2024 Year 2024 This

The High Court examined the validity of the summoning order and ...


Cheque dishonor case: High Court upholds summoning order, framing notice u/s 138.

Case Laws     Indian Laws

November 5, 2024

The High Court examined the validity of the summoning order and framing of notice u/s 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, in a dishonor of cheque case. It reiterated that the High Court's inherent powers u/s 482 of the CrPC (now Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023) should be exercised sparingly and with caution, without unnecessary interference unless there is material irregularity or illegality. Section 138 provides a quasi-criminal remedy for dishonor of cheques, and summons may be quashed if the complaint lacks evidence of an offence. The High Court cannot examine disputed facts u/s 482 when the complainant contests the plea. Summons can be issued only when a prima facie case is made out based on documents and evidence with the complaint. The Court upheld the Trial Court's reasoned order rejecting the revision petition and framing the notice of charge, finding no grounds to invoke Section 482 jurisdiction at this stage. It highlighted the procedural hardship often faced by complainants in Section 138 cases due to frequent challenges to summoning orders.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Dishonor of cheque - presumption that cheque was issued in discharge of legal liability, burden on accused to prove contrary. Supreme Court observations: While deciding...

  2. Dishonor of Cheque - validity of legal notice - the exact amount, which the appellant claimed for towards the dishonoured cheques was not mentioned in the legal notice,...

  3. Dishonor of Cheque - Different cheques, may be issued for discharging the liability, arising out of one and same transaction, are separate entities and dishonour of each...

  4. Dishonor of Cheque - funds insufficient - difference in drawer’s signature - Apex Court has held that, criminal prosecution against the accused in such cases should be...

  5. Conviction u/s 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act - dishonoured cheques - generally there is no bar under the N.I. Act to send a reminder notice to the drawer of the...

  6. Dishonor of Cheque - The law is well-settled that the complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act is not maintainable, if no demand was made for...

  7. Dishonor of cheque u/s 138 - validity of statutory demand notice - The legal notice is not confined to the cheque amount. The respondents have not specifically asked for...

  8. Dishonor of cheque due to account freeze falls within the purview of Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The test is whether the account had insufficient...

  9. Dishonor of cheque due to insufficient funds - failure to rebut presumption u/s 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act. Court must presume cheque issued in discharge of legal...

  10. Dishonor of Cheque - insufficiency of funds - misuse of blank signed cheques by power agent - In the absence of the Principal appearing before this Court to substantiate...

  11. Dishonor of cheque - mismatch of signatures or incomplete signatures - The Supreme Court in a case has came to the conclusion that criminal prosecution against the...

  12. Dishonour of Cheque - proceedings initiated by the appellant under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Validity of handwritten note (Notice) sent by...

  13. Dishonor of Cheque - In case part payment/s is made after the filing of the complaint, since the offence already stands completed in terms of Section 138(c) of the N.I....

  14. Dishonor of Cheque - For proving offence under Section 138 of NI Act, it has to be established that the cheque has been issued by the accused to discharge a legally...

  15. The High Court addressed the challenge to the acquittal of the accused u/s 255(1) of Cr. P. C. for dishonoring a cheque due to insufficient funds. It clarified that the...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates