Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Indian Laws - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights November 2024 Year 2024 This

This case pertains to the dishonor of cheques and the challenge ...


Cheque dishonor case: Firm and directors not liable for cheques signed by individual in personal capacity.

Case Laws     Indian Laws

November 7, 2024

This case pertains to the dishonor of cheques and the challenge to cognizance and summoning orders. The key points are: The cheques were signed and issued by respondent No. 3, Bhagawat Daulat Gawali, in his individual capacity, unconnected to the petitioners or the alleged business transaction between petitioner No. 1 (Bipin Lal Singh Pagar through his proprietorship firm) and respondent No. 2 (Tiger Logistics (India) Limited). The cheques were dishonored due to "Account Closed." Since petitioner No. 1 did not sign the cheques, he cannot be held liable u/s 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Respondent No. 2's claim that the cheques were issued by respondent No. 3 on behalf of the petitioners may be grounds for a civil suit but not a complaint u/s 138. The petitioners, not being signatories, cannot be summoned in the complaint case u/s 138. The summoning orders against the petitioners are set aside, though proceedings may continue against Bhagawat Daulat Gawali in accordance with the law.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Dishonor of Cheque - Insufficient Balance - offences by companies - Vicaricious liability - In this case there are no averments in the complaint that the...

  2. Dishonour of cheque - vicarious liability in criminal law - The SC interpreted Section 7 of the NI Act to identify the "drawer" as the individual issuing the cheque,...

  3. Dishonor of Cheque - signing of cheque jointly - vicarious liability u/s 141 of NI Act - True it is that in the case at hand, cheque in question has been signed by...

  4. Dishonor of Cheque - vicarious liability of an independent director - In absence of any specific averments or allegations carving out a specific role attributable to...

  5. Dishonour of Cheque - Liability of the Managing Director of the company - The petitioners have failed to bring on record any unimpeachable material or material of...

  6. Dishonour of Cheque - Seeking setting aside of summoning order - vicarious liability on partner of a firm - The name of the petitioner is conspicuously not mentioned as...

  7. Dishonour of Cheque - vicarious liability of director - The petitioners argued that they had resigned from their directorship well before the cheque was issued and could...

  8. Dishonor of Cheque - prosecution against the person who signed the cheque or the person who has authorized the signatory - The law on the point is made very clear. When...

  9. Dishonour of Cheque - vicarious liability of director - cheque was issued prior to the date of director joining the company - The petitioners have failed to bring on...

  10. Dishonor of Cheque - vicarious liability of the independent Director - In absence of any specific averments or allegations carving out a specific role attributable to...

  11. Dishonor of Cheque - Personal liability of the Director / Signatory of the Company - The appellant is not entitled to contend that the offence has been committed by the...

  12. Dishonour of Cheque - interference with the order of acquittal of the accused - If the Managing Director or Joint Director of the company takes personal responsibility...

  13. Dishonor of Cheque - Vicarious liability of Director - The primary liability in a cheque bounce case where cheque has been issued on behalf of the company is upon the...

  14. Dishonour of Cheque - vicarious liability of the director - The Court found that, the resignation of the directors, as recorded in Form 32, indicates their...

  15. Dishonor of Cheque - insufficiency of funds - misuse of blank signed cheques by power agent - In the absence of the Principal appearing before this Court to substantiate...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates