Income recognition rules and accounting standards for revenue ...

Construction Revenue Recognition: Assessee wins when AS-9 & Section 43CB deemed inapplicable for ongoing pre-2016 project.

Case Laws Income Tax

November 6, 2024

Income recognition rules and accounting standards for revenue from construction contracts were at issue. The assessee argued that AS-9 was not applicable as it specifically excludes revenue from construction contracts. Section 43CB, introduced with effect from 01.04.2017, mandates revenue recognition based on ICDS-3 for construction contracts. ICDS-3 allows recognizing revenue using the regular method for contracts commenced before 31.03.2016 and not completed by that date. As the assessee's residential project commenced before 31.03.2016 and was ongoing, neither AS-9 nor Section 43CB applied. Consequently, the CIT(A)'s deletion of the addition was upheld, and the Revenue's appeal was dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Income recognition rules and accounting standards for revenue ...

Construction Revenue Recognition: Assessee wins when AS-9 & Section 43CB deemed inapplicable for ongoing pre-2016 project.

Case Laws Income Tax

November 6, 2024

You may also like:

Addition on account of revenue recognition following percentage of completion method (POCM) - as per AO assessee had incurred substantial expenses on construction but...

Unearned revenue from subscription services - AO has clearly erred in changing consistently followed method of revenue recognition adopted by the assessee.We find due...

Revenue recognition - The difference in revenue generating pattern. ‘NOP’ project already completed but certain portion of development remain unsold. It shows that...

Revision u/s 263 - Revenue recognition against advances received - It is the other party who makes the payment, who has not objected or had not made any claim against...

Revision u/s 263 - The methodology adopted by the assessee for revenue recognition was being consistently followed by the assessee during previous and subsequent...

The Appellate Tribunal interpreted the term "business of construction" u/s 115WE(3) r.w.s 115WG to determine fringe benefit tax value. The issue was whether ship...

Assessee followed joint venture model for sharing revenue with collaborators as per franchise agreement. Assessee recorded all revenues, incurred expenditure, and shared...

Change in method of revenue recognition - Non recognizing income by changing the method - There is no valid explanation for claiming expenses related to the CAS services...

Commercial and Industrial Construction Servcie - Revenue’s argument that construction of schools and colleges will come within the meaning of Commercial or Industrial...

Revenue or capital expenditure - current repairs u/s 31 - overhead expenditure on construction - deductionallowed - AT

The Appellate Tribunal reviewed a case involving a revision u/s 263 related to errors in revenue recognition methods. The Commissioner has the authority to examine and...

Revenue Recognition - AS 9 - membership fees - assessee was justified in deferring the revenue for taxation for four years .... - AT

Deemed dividend u/s 2(22)(e) is not taxable in the hands of the assessee company if it is not a shareholder in the companies that extended loans. It is chargeable to tax...

The assessee made investments in two firms by purchasing cold storage units funded by M/s. A.R. Constructions, where the assessee is a managing partner. The source for...

Revision u/s 263 - Method of accounting adopted for revenue recognition of the project - The Tribunal decided that the Pr.CIT erred in directing the AO to reassess based...

Quick Updates: